Tas Muhammed Dara, Gurdal Mehmet, Kocamanoglu Meltem, Korkmaz Ilayda, Arici Mesut, Yaman Banu, Palamar Melis, Yildirim Nuri, Çalışır Ali, Gönen Eda Seçil, Becerik Ilgin Timarci, Barut Selver Ozlem
Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir, Turkey.
Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Ocular Surface Research Laboratory, Izmir, Turkey; LimbuStem R&D Medical Products Ltd., Ege University Technopark, Izmir, Turkey.
Exp Eye Res. 2025 Mar;252:110259. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2025.110259. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical and histopathological effectiveness of topical amniotic membrane extract (AME) applied at a clinically relevant dose in an experimental corneal alkaline burn model and to compare the results with amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) as one of the most frequently used biologically based treatment options. To create an alkaline burn model, NaOH-impregnated filter paper was applied to all rabbits for 30 s. Rabbits were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (n = 6): AME eye drop; Group 2 (n = 6): AMT; Group 3 (n = 4): control group. AME eye drops were applied as 1 drop 4 times a day for 28 days. Clinical findings including corneal opacity, corneal vascularization, limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) was evaluated and graded in accordance with the updated literature. On day 28, corneas were histopathologically examined under the light microscope. Stromal inflammation, stromal fibrosis, intraepithelial edema, and corneal vascularization were scored in each group. When the groups were compared clinically, corneal opacity was significantly (p = 0.009) lower in the AME group. While lower LSCD grades were observed in the AME group, this difference was not significant (p > 0.05). Histopathologically; in the AME group, stromal inflammatory cell inflammation, corneal vascularization, intraepithelial edema, stromal fibrosis, and metaplastic epithelial layer thickness were significantly (p = 0.004; p = 0.022; p = 0.008; p = 0.002; p = 0.002, respectively) lower than the other groups.In this study, it was shown that AME eye drops were clinically and histopathologically more successful in providing corneal healing than the AMT and control groups in the ocular alkaline burn model. These findings are valuable as they show that AME eye drops may be an easy-to-apply biologically based treatment alternative to AMT in chemical burns.
本研究的目的是在实验性角膜碱烧伤模型中,研究以临床相关剂量应用局部羊膜提取物(AME)的临床和组织病理学效果,并将结果与羊膜移植(AMT)进行比较,AMT是最常用的基于生物的治疗选择之一。为了建立碱烧伤模型,将浸有NaOH的滤纸应用于所有兔子30秒。兔子分为3组:第1组(n = 6):AME滴眼液组;第2组(n = 6):AMT组;第3组(n = 4):对照组。AME滴眼液每天滴4次,每次1滴,共28天。根据最新文献对包括角膜混浊、角膜血管化、角膜缘干细胞缺乏(LSCD)在内的临床发现进行评估和分级。在第28天,在光学显微镜下对角膜进行组织病理学检查。对每组的基质炎症、基质纤维化、上皮内水肿和角膜血管化进行评分。临床比较各组时,AME组的角膜混浊明显较低(p = 0.009)。虽然AME组观察到较低的LSCD分级,但这种差异不显著(p>0.05)。组织病理学上;在AME组中,基质炎性细胞炎症、角膜血管化、上皮内水肿、基质纤维化和化生上皮层厚度均显著低于其他组(分别为p = 0.004;p = 0.022;p = 0.008;p = 0.002;p = 0.002)。在本研究中,结果表明,在眼碱烧伤模型中,AME滴眼液在促进角膜愈合方面在临床和组织病理学上比AMT组和对照组更成功。这些发现很有价值,因为它们表明AME滴眼液可能是化学烧伤中一种易于应用的基于生物的AMT治疗替代方法。