Maskevich Svetlana, Shen Lin, Wiley Joshua F, Drummond Sean P A, Bei Bei
School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sleep Med. 2025 Mar;127:178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.12.035. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
Using an intense longitudinal design, we investigated adolescents' perceptions of everyday factors facilitating (i.e., facilitators) and hindering (i.e., barriers) sufficient and good quality sleep.
Adolescents (N = 205, M = 16.9 ± 0.9, 54.1 % female, 64.4 % non-white) completed daily morning surveys, assessing self-reported sleep and the use of 8 facilitators and 6 barriers of sleep from the previous night, and wore actigraphs over 2 school-weeks followed by 2 vacation-weeks (5162 total observations). Linear mixed-effects models examined the contribution of facilitators/barriers to actigraphy and self-reported total sleep time (TST) and sleep onset latency (SOL), controlling for age, sex, race, and study day. School/non-school day status was included as a moderator.
Seven facilitators and two barriers were reported by >30 % of adolescents as frequently (≥50 % nights) helping/preventing them from achieving good sleep. Facilitators or barriers explained 1-5% (p-values <.001) of unique variance above and beyond the covariates. Facilitators that predicted better sleep were: following body cues, managing thoughts and emotions, creating good sleep environment, avoiding activities interfering with sleep, and bedtime planning (only TST on school nights). Barriers that predicted worse sleep were: pre-bed thoughts and emotions, unconducive sleep environment, activities interfering with sleep, inconsistent routines, and other household members' activities.
Adolescents use a range of sleep-facilitating behaviours, and a number of factors prevent sufficient and good quality sleep in their everyday life. These factors are predictive of their sleep duration and onset latency and require further research to understand their functions and clinical implications.
采用密集纵向设计,我们调查了青少年对促进(即促进因素)和阻碍(即障碍因素)充足且高质量睡眠的日常因素的认知。
青少年(N = 205,M = 16.9 ± 0.9,54.1%为女性,64.4%为非白人)每天早晨完成调查,评估自我报告的睡眠情况以及前一晚8种促进因素和6种睡眠障碍因素的使用情况,并在2个上学周和随后的2个假期周佩戴活动记录仪(共5162次观察)。线性混合效应模型检验了促进因素/障碍因素对活动记录仪记录的和自我报告的总睡眠时间(TST)以及入睡潜伏期(SOL)的影响,同时控制了年龄、性别、种族和研究日。将上学日/非上学日状态作为调节变量纳入分析。
超过30%的青少年报告称,七种促进因素和两种障碍因素经常(≥50%的夜晚)帮助/阻止他们获得良好睡眠。促进因素或障碍因素解释了协变量之外1 - 5%(p值 <.001)的独特方差。预测睡眠质量更好的促进因素包括:遵循身体信号、管理思想和情绪、营造良好的睡眠环境、避免干扰睡眠的活动以及就寝时间规划(仅适用于上学日夜晚的TST)。预测睡眠质量较差的障碍因素包括:睡前思想和情绪、不利于睡眠的环境、干扰睡眠的活动、不规律的日常安排以及其他家庭成员的活动。
青少年采用一系列促进睡眠的行为,并且一些因素在他们的日常生活中阻碍了充足且高质量的睡眠。这些因素可预测他们的睡眠时间和入睡潜伏期,需要进一步研究以了解其功能和临床意义。