• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络流量和谷歌趋势数据显示,在美国最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊案做出裁决后,人们对新型男性避孕方法的兴趣有所增加。

Web traffic and Google Trends data show increased interest in novel male contraception following the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson ruling.

作者信息

Brewer Claudia, Nguyen Brian T

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, United States.

Section of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Contraception. 2025 May;145:110835. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110835. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110835
PMID:39892445
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Explore online public interest in male contraception in the United States after the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson ruling.

STUDY DESIGN

We used Google Trends to examine relative search volumes for "male birth control" and observed the number of daily visits to two male contraception research websites during the weeks before and after the ruling.

RESULTS

The mean relative search volume for "male birth control" more than doubled during the period after the ruling was publicized (p = 0.002). Daily visits to both male contraception websites peaked immediately following the ruling.

CONCLUSIONS

The overturning of federal abortion protections preceded a spike in United States public interest in male contraception.

摘要

目的

在最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊案作出裁决后,探究美国在线公众对男性避孕的兴趣。

研究设计

我们使用谷歌趋势来检查“男性节育”的相对搜索量,并观察了裁决前后几周内两个男性避孕研究网站的每日访问量。

结果

在裁决公布后的时期内,“男性节育”的平均相对搜索量增加了一倍多(p = 0.002)。两个男性避孕网站的每日访问量在裁决后立即达到峰值。

结论

联邦堕胎保护的推翻先于美国公众对男性避孕兴趣的激增。

相似文献

1
Web traffic and Google Trends data show increased interest in novel male contraception following the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson ruling.网络流量和谷歌趋势数据显示,在美国最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊案做出裁决后,人们对新型男性避孕方法的兴趣有所增加。
Contraception. 2025 May;145:110835. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110835. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后,与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势:州法律有多大影响?
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
3
Changes in Reproductive Health Information-Seeking Behaviors After the Dobbs Decision: Systematic Search of the Wikimedia Database.多布斯案裁决后生殖健康信息寻求行为的变化:维基媒体数据库的系统检索
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Dec 16;4:e64577. doi: 10.2196/64577.
4
Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.美国最高法院“多布斯案”判决后口服避孕药和紧急避孕药的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418620. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18620.
5
Potential Effects of on Civil Commitment Law.对民事收容法的潜在影响。 (你提供的原文中“of”后面似乎缺少具体内容)
Am J Law Med. 2023 Jul;49(2-3):359-373. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.37. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
6
Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.多布斯诉杰克逊案对患者和医疗保健提供者的公共卫生和临床影响:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0288947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288947. eCollection 2024.
7
Abortion pill marketing and sourcing on twitter following Dobbs v. Jackson supreme court ruling.“多布斯诉杰克逊案”最高法院裁决后,推特上的堕胎药营销和供应。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2024 Aug;29(4):139-144. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2024.2354868. Epub 2024 May 23.
8
Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.违背人民意愿:美国最高法院推翻堕胎权。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Oct-Dec;VII(4):261-263. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2022.057. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
9
Online Medication Abortion Direct-to-Patient Fulfillment Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision.多布斯诉杰克逊案前后的在线药物流产直接向患者提供服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2434675. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34675.
10
Implications of United States Supreme Court's ruling on Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health Organization: perspective of physicians caring for critically ill fetuses and newborns.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;60(6):812-813. doi: 10.1002/uog.26107. Epub 2022 Nov 10.