Zhu Jiakang, Deng Xianfeng, Jin Chunxiao, Ma Liya, Huang Cui
State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
J Dent. 2025 Mar;154:105599. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105599. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
To assess the accuracy of a wireless intraoral scanner (IOS) in scanning post spaces with different diameters and depths.
Six maxillary central incisors underwent endodontic treatment and tooth preparation. Post space preparation was performed using a #4 or #6 post drill to depths of 6, 8, and 10 mm, respectively. Direct digital impressions of the post spaces were scanned using an IOS (Trios 5, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) ten times as test data. Conventional impressions were also taken and subsequently scanned using a laboratory scanner to serve as reference data. The accuracy of the test data was evaluated through both 3D and 2D comparisons against the reference data. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (α=0.05).
As post space depth increased or diameter decreased, 3D root mean square (RMS) values increased, ranging from 65.7 μm to 82.8 μm (p < 0.001), while the proportion of green region (indicating a deviation within 0.1 mm) decreased from 90.05 % to 76.38 % (p < 0.001). 2D RMS values gradually decreased from the cervical to the apical region. Except for the apical region in the #4 drill group with a 10 mm depth, all 3D and 2D RMS values remained below 100 μm. Furthermore, only the post space with a 10 mm depth in the #4 drill group exhibited a proportion of green region <80 %.
The accuracy of the wireless IOS in post space scanning was significantly affected by both depth and diameter, and decreased with increasing depth or decreasing diameter. Furthermore, the accuracy diminished as the scan approached the apical region.
When the depth of post space prepared with a 1.9 mm diameter drill is ≤8 mm or when prepared with a 2.25 mm diameter drill is ≤10 mm, Trios 5 is suitable for direct digital impressions.
评估无线口腔内扫描仪(IOS)扫描不同直径和深度桩道的准确性。
对6颗上颌中切牙进行根管治疗和牙体预备。分别使用#4或#6桩钻进行桩道预备,深度分别为6、8和10 mm。使用IOS(Trios 5,3Shape,丹麦哥本哈根)对桩道进行直接数字化印模扫描10次作为测试数据。同时制取传统印模,随后使用实验室扫描仪进行扫描作为参考数据。通过与参考数据进行三维和二维比较来评估测试数据的准确性。采用方差分析进行统计分析(α = 0.05)。
随着桩道深度增加或直径减小,三维均方根(RMS)值增加,范围为65.7μm至82.8μm(p < 0.001),而绿色区域比例(表示偏差在0.1 mm以内)从90.05%降至76.38%(p < 0.001)。二维RMS值从颈部到根尖区域逐渐降低。除了#4钻组深度为10 mm的根尖区域外,所有三维和二维RMS值均保持在100μm以下。此外,只有#4钻组深度为10 mm的桩道绿色区域比例<80%。
无线IOS在桩道扫描中的准确性受深度和直径的显著影响,随着深度增加或直径减小而降低。此外,随着扫描接近根尖区域,准确性降低。
当使用直径1.9 mm的钻制备桩道深度≤8 mm或使用直径2.25 mm的钻制备桩道深度≤10 mm时,Trios 5适用于直接数字化印模。