Yamane Kei, Anazawa Takayuki, Nagai Kazuyuki, Kasai Yosuke, Masui Toshihiko, Izuwa Aya, Kurahashi Koki, Ishida Satoshi, Ogiso Satoshi, Yoshimura Michio, Iwai Takahiro, Matsubara Junichi, Fukuda Akihisa, Isoda Hiroyoshi, Hidaka Yu, Ibi Yumiko, Hatano Etsuro
Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3603-3613. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-16956-z. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) remains unclear. This study was designed to evaluate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy by using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (NAC-IMRT) for R-PDAC compared with upfront surgery (UpS).
Among 198 patients with R-PDAC who were indicated for resection between 2013 and 2021, 130 were included in this study after excluding patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and did not meet the NAC-IMRT criteria (Eligible set). NAC-IMRT was planned for 58 patients, and UpS was planned for 72 patients. Additionally, in 105 patients who could undergo the planned treatment (As-treated set), the surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were evaluated.
In the Eligible set, median overall survival (OS) was 50.5 months with NAC-IMRT and 34.7 months with UpS and progression-free survival was 20.4 months with NAC-IMRT and 13.9 months with UpS. In the As-treated set, OS was longer in the NAC-IMRT group (66.7 months vs. 34.7 months, p = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, NAC-IMRT was identified as an independent factor for better OS (hazard ratio 0.617, 95% confidence interval 0.382-0.995, p = 0.047, in the Eligible set). The incidence of postoperative complications did not show a difference between the two groups, and NAC-IMRT suppressed local tumor invasion, including lymphatic, venous, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastases.
NAC-IMRT may offer superior survival outcomes and manageable toxicity in R-PDAC patients compared with upfront surgery. This study supports the efficacy and safety of NAC-IMRT and recommends its consideration in R-PDAC treatment protocols.
可切除性胰腺导管腺癌(R-PDAC)新辅助放化疗的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估与直接手术(UpS)相比,调强放疗(NAC-IMRT)用于R-PDAC新辅助放化疗的效果。
在2013年至2021年间198例拟行切除术的R-PDAC患者中,排除接受新辅助化疗且不符合NAC-IMRT标准的患者后,130例纳入本研究(符合条件组)。计划对58例患者进行NAC-IMRT,对72例患者进行UpS。此外,在105例能够接受计划治疗的患者(实际治疗组)中,评估手术、病理和肿瘤学结局。
在符合条件组中,NAC-IMRT组的中位总生存期(OS)为50.5个月,UpS组为34.7个月;无进展生存期NAC-IMRT组为20.4个月,UpS组为13.9个月。在实际治疗组中,NAC-IMRT组的OS更长(66.7个月对34.7个月,p = 0.007)。多因素分析显示,NAC-IMRT是OS改善的独立因素(符合条件组中,风险比0.617,95%置信区间0.382-0.995,p = 0.047)。两组术后并发症发生率无差异,NAC-IMRT抑制局部肿瘤侵袭,包括淋巴管、静脉、神经周围侵袭和淋巴结转移。
与直接手术相比,NAC-IMRT可能为R-PDAC患者提供更好的生存结局和可管理的毒性。本研究支持NAC-IMRT的疗效和安全性,并建议在R-PDAC治疗方案中考虑使用。