Krystecka Klaudia, Stanczyk Magdalena, Choinski Mateusz, Szelag Elzbieta, Szymaszek Aneta
Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteur Street, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 5/7 Stawki Street, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland.
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Feb 5;35(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae500.
Temporal processing and inhibitory control are closely interconnected. This study investigated whether individuals of high and low temporal efficiency display different behavioral and neural patterns while performing an electrophysiological Go/No-Go task. Individuals with lower temporal processing had significantly poorer behavioral performance of the task-slower reaction times to Go stimuli, greater number of omissions, and lower stimulus detectability (lower d-prime value)-than the high temporal efficiency group. Additionally, participants with low temporal efficiency had significantly lower P300 response to correct inhibitions (No-Go stimuli) compared to those with high temporal efficiency. Furthermore, the greater amplitude of the difference wave (No-Go vs Go) in the high temporal efficiency group may suggest superior efficacy of response inhibition and attention control processes in comparison to the low temporal efficiency group. These findings highlight significant differences in inhibitory control at both behavioral and neural levels in young adults differing in temporal processing efficiency.
时间处理与抑制控制紧密相连。本研究调查了在执行一项电生理的“执行/不执行”任务时,时间效率高和低的个体是否表现出不同的行为和神经模式。与时间效率高的组相比,时间处理能力较低的个体在该任务中的行为表现明显更差——对执行刺激的反应时间更慢、遗漏次数更多,以及刺激可检测性更低(d'值更低)。此外,与时间效率高的参与者相比,时间效率低的参与者对正确抑制(不执行刺激)的P300反应明显更低。此外,与时间效率低的组相比,时间效率高的组中差异波(不执行与执行)的幅度更大,这可能表明其反应抑制和注意力控制过程的效能更高。这些发现凸显了在时间处理效率不同的年轻成年人中,抑制控制在行为和神经水平上的显著差异。