Suppr超能文献

已故捐赠者肾脏移植决策的动态过程:对个体临床医生捐赠决策研究的见解

The dynamics of deceased donor kidney transplant decision making: insights from studying individual clinicians' offer decisions.

作者信息

Green Ellen, Dutcher E Glenn, Schold Jesse D, Stewart Darren

机构信息

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

Department of Economics, University of North Carolina-Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2025 Jul;25(7):1471-1480. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

Abstract

Despite the high demand, >7500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians vs centers and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (from January 2016 to December 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level data set with 344 678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians vs centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed-effect logistic regression models. To complement kidney donor profile index as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated expected acceptance probability, adjusting for a broader set of donor characteristics and recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35; 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level (0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) variances were significant, with heterogeneity in the kidney donor profile index-acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.

摘要

尽管需求很高,但每年有超过7500个恢复功能的肾脏未被利用,各移植中心在供肾接受率方面存在显著差异。然而,目前尚不清楚同一中心内个体临床医生之间的这种差异有多大,以及它对分配效率和公平性的影响。本研究量化了临床医生与中心在肾移植供肾接受决策上的差异,并探讨了供体质量在接受决策中的作用。我们分析了与15个移植中心的值班记录相关联的国家移植登记数据(2016年1月至2020年12月),创建了一个包含344678例已故供体肾移植供肾的临床医生层面数据集。主要结果是通过分层混合效应逻辑回归模型量化临床医生与中心在供肾接受方面的差异。为补充作为供体质量衡量指标的肾脏供体概况指数,我们纳入了预期接受概率,并对更广泛的供体特征和受体因素进行了调整。中心层面(0.35;95%置信区间:0.15 - 0.79)和临床医生层面(0.10;95%置信区间:0.06 - 0.18)的差异均具有统计学意义,临床医生之间的肾脏供体概况指数 - 接受关联存在异质性。这些结果强调了需要进一步研究驱动临床医生层面差异的机制及其对器官分配效果、公平性和患者结局的影响。

相似文献

3
Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.增加实体器官捐献者登记的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 4;4(4):CD10829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010829.pub2.
10
Evaluating Long-Term Outcomes Among Hispanic Kidney Transplant Recipients.评估西班牙裔肾移植受者的长期预后。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Jul;86(1):52-62.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.01.013. Epub 2025 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Innovative Research Methods: Using Simulation to Evaluate Health Care Policy.创新研究方法:运用模拟评估医疗保健政策。
Simul Healthc. 2024 Jun 1;19(3):176-178. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000751. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
3
Physician Preferences when Selecting Candidates for Lower-Quality Kidney Offers.医生在选择低质量肾脏供体时的偏好。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Dec 1;18(12):1599-1609. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000302. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
4
6
Beyond donation to organ utilization in the USA.超越美国的器官捐献与利用。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2023 Jun 1;28(3):197-206. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000001060. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
8
Time to discard the term "discard".是时候摒弃“摒弃”这个术语了。
Am J Transplant. 2023 May;23(5):608-610. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.01.018. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
9
Does anybody really know what (the kidney median waiting) time is?有人真的知道(肾脏中位等待)时间是多少吗?
Am J Transplant. 2023 Feb;23(2):223-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.005. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验