Green Ellen, Dutcher E Glenn, Schold Jesse D, Stewart Darren
College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Department of Economics, University of North Carolina-Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Transplant. 2025 Jul;25(7):1471-1480. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Despite the high demand, >7500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians vs centers and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (from January 2016 to December 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level data set with 344 678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians vs centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed-effect logistic regression models. To complement kidney donor profile index as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated expected acceptance probability, adjusting for a broader set of donor characteristics and recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35; 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level (0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) variances were significant, with heterogeneity in the kidney donor profile index-acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.
尽管需求很高,但每年有超过7500个恢复功能的肾脏未被利用,各移植中心在供肾接受率方面存在显著差异。然而,目前尚不清楚同一中心内个体临床医生之间的这种差异有多大,以及它对分配效率和公平性的影响。本研究量化了临床医生与中心在肾移植供肾接受决策上的差异,并探讨了供体质量在接受决策中的作用。我们分析了与15个移植中心的值班记录相关联的国家移植登记数据(2016年1月至2020年12月),创建了一个包含344678例已故供体肾移植供肾的临床医生层面数据集。主要结果是通过分层混合效应逻辑回归模型量化临床医生与中心在供肾接受方面的差异。为补充作为供体质量衡量指标的肾脏供体概况指数,我们纳入了预期接受概率,并对更广泛的供体特征和受体因素进行了调整。中心层面(0.35;95%置信区间:0.15 - 0.79)和临床医生层面(0.10;95%置信区间:0.06 - 0.18)的差异均具有统计学意义,临床医生之间的肾脏供体概况指数 - 接受关联存在异质性。这些结果强调了需要进一步研究驱动临床医生层面差异的机制及其对器官分配效果、公平性和患者结局的影响。