Suppr超能文献

两种肠道病毒71型疫苗免疫后不良事件监测:中国一项真实世界的比较研究

Adverse events following immunization surveillance on two types of enterovirus 71 vaccines: A real-world comparative study in China.

作者信息

Zhu Yiqing, Wang Yihan, Wang Jinghui, Wang Yafei, Sun Li, Cui Shiheng, Li Jing, Guo Yu

机构信息

Department of Immunization Management, Hebei Province Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.

出版信息

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2458831. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2458831. Epub 2025 Feb 2.

Abstract

To comprehensively assess the safety and difference of two types of EV71 vaccines: EV71-Vero, produced using Vero cells and EV71-H2, using human diploid cells. Our research included children of the recommended age who voluntarily received the EV71 vaccine in Hebei Province from 2019 to 2023. Detailed data on adverse events following immunization (AEFI) were collected, analyzed and compared for EV71-Vero and EV71-H2 vaccines. With 477 AEFI reported, the reported rate was 14.21 per 100,000 doses. Most cases occurred in infants under one year of age (45.91%). No significant differences in the AEFI reported rate were found between two types of EV71 vaccines across various demographic. However, a higher number of AEFI was reported in children under 1-year old following EV71-Vero compared to EV71-H2 with a reversal in 4-5 years- group ( = 13.90,  = .01). The prognosis of cured took higher proportion for EV71-Vero than for EV71-H2 while inversely with improved outcome. The EV71 vaccine is advisable recommend to the appropriate age children to prevent EV7l infection. Both the EV71-Vero and EV71-H2 vaccines have good safety profiles. The reported AEFI, primarily high fever and allergic reactions, showed no significant differences in reported rates or case characteristics between the two types.

摘要

为全面评估两种肠道病毒71型(EV71)疫苗的安全性和差异:使用Vero细胞生产的EV71-Vero疫苗和使用人二倍体细胞生产的EV71-H2疫苗。我们的研究纳入了2019年至2023年在河北省自愿接种EV71疫苗的推荐年龄儿童。收集、分析并比较了EV71-Vero疫苗和EV71-H2疫苗的免疫后不良事件(AEFI)详细数据。共报告477例AEFI,报告率为每10万剂14.21例。大多数病例发生在1岁以下婴儿(45.91%)。在不同人口统计学特征中,两种EV71疫苗的AEFI报告率未发现显著差异。然而,与EV71-H2疫苗相比,EV71-Vero疫苗接种后1岁以下儿童报告的AEFI数量更多,4至5岁组情况相反(χ² = 13.90,P = 0.01)。EV71-Vero疫苗治愈预后的比例高于EV71-H2疫苗,而改善预后情况则相反。建议向适当年龄的儿童推荐EV71疫苗以预防EV71感染。EV71-Vero疫苗和EV71-H2疫苗均具有良好的安全性。报告的AEFI主要为高热和过敏反应,两种疫苗在报告率或病例特征方面均未显示出显著差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验