审视人工智能主体
Interrogating artificial agency.
作者信息
Wong Hong Yu
机构信息
Department of Philosophy and Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 17;15:1449320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1449320. eCollection 2024.
Abstract
Can artificial systems act? In the literature we find two camps: sceptics and believers. But the issue of whether artificial systems can act and, if so, how, has not been systematically discussed. This is a foundational question for the philosophy of AI. I sketch a methodological approach to investigating the agency of artificial systems from architectural and behavioural perspectives.
摘要
人工系统能行动吗？在文献中我们发现有两个阵营：怀疑论者和相信者。但是人工系统是否能行动以及如果能的话如何行动这一问题尚未得到系统的讨论。这是人工智能哲学的一个基础性问题。我勾勒出一种从架构和行为视角研究人工系统能动性的方法论途径。
相似文献
1
Interrogating artificial agency.审视人工智能主体
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 17;15:1449320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1449320. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparing answers of artificial intelligence systems and clinical toxicologists to questions about poisoning: Can their answers be distinguished?比较人工智能系统和临床毒理学家对中毒问题的回答：能否区分他们的答案？
Emergencias. 2024 Oct;36(5):351-358. doi: 10.55633/s3me/082.2024.
3
Could artificial intelligence write mental health nursing care plans?人工智能能写心理健康护理计划吗？
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Feb;31(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12965. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
4
Potentials and pitfalls of ChatGPT and natural-language artificial intelligence models for the understanding of laboratory medicine test results. An assessment by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group on Artificial Intelligence (WG-AI).ChatGPT 和自然语言人工智能模型在理解检验医学结果方面的潜力和陷阱。欧洲临床化学和检验医学联合会（EFLM）人工智能工作组（WG-AI）的评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Apr 24;61(7):1158-1166. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0355. Print 2023 Jun 27.
5
Large language models and generative AI in telehealth: a responsible use lens.大语言模型和生成式人工智能在远程医疗中的应用：负责任使用的视角。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 1;31(9):2125-2136. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae035.
6
Motivations for Artificial Intelligence, for Deep Learning, for ALife: Mortality and Existential Risk.人工智能、深度学习、人工生命的动机：死亡率和存在风险。
Artif Life. 2024 Feb 1;30(1):48-64. doi: 10.1162/artl_a_00427.
7
A comparative analysis of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.0 on a multiple-choice ophthalmology question bank: A study on artificial intelligence developments.基于多项选择题眼科题库对GPT-3.5和GPT-4.0的比较分析：一项关于人工智能发展的研究。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct-Dec;68(4):367-371. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2024.67.
8
Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in Turkish orthopedic progression exams.探索人工智能在土耳其骨科进展考试中的作用。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2025 Mar 17;59(1):18-26. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2025.24090.
9
What is new with Artificial Intelligence? Human-agent interactions through the lens of social agency.人工智能有哪些新进展？从社会能动性视角看人与智能体的交互。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:954444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954444. eCollection 2022.
10
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Analyzing the Performance of ChatGPT and Microsoft Bing in Scoliosis Detection and Cobb Angle Assessment.医学成像中的人工智能：分析ChatGPT和Microsoft Bing在脊柱侧弯检测和Cobb角评估中的性能。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 5;14(7):773. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14070773.
本文引用的文献
1
Neural networks for abstraction and reasoning.神经网络的抽象和推理。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 13;14(1):27823. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73582-7.
2
Unifying Principles of Generalization: Past, Present, and Future.泛化的统一原则：过去、现在与未来。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2025 Jan;76(1):275-302. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-021524-110810. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
3
ChatGPT broke the Turing test - the race is on for new ways to assess AI.ChatGPT 通过了图灵测试——评估人工智能新方法的竞争已经展开。
Nature. 2023 Jul;619(7971):686-689. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-02361-7.
4
The teleological stance: Past, present, and future.目的论立场：过去、现在和未来。
Dev Sci. 2020 Sep;23(5):e12970. doi: 10.1111/desc.12970. Epub 2020 May 21.
5
Artificial agents, good care, and modernity.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2015 Aug;36(4):265-77. doi: 10.1007/s11017-015-9331-y.
6
The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework.行动现象学：一个概念框架。
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):179-217. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
7
Agency in natural and artificial systems.自然与人工系统中的能动性。
Artif Life. 2005 Winter-Spring;11(1-2):161-75. doi: 10.1162/1064546053278919.
8
Teleological reasoning in infancy: the nai;ve theory of rational action.婴儿期的目的论推理：朴素理性行动理论。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jul;7(7):287-292. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00128-1.
Zotero 插件