Murphy Rebecca, Khera Charandeep, Osborne Emma L
Centre for Research on Eating Disorders at Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jan 17;6:1499350. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1499350. eCollection 2024.
Only a minority of people with eating disorders receive evidence-based psychological treatment. This is especially true for those with recurrent binge eating because the shame that accompanies binge eating affects help seeking and there is a shortage of therapists to provide psychological treatments. Digital programme-led interventions have the potential to overcome both barriers.
This study examined the acceptability and effectiveness of a new digital programme-led intervention directly based on enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT-E), which is an empirically supported psychological treatment for eating disorders.
One hundred and ten adults with recurrent binge eating (self-reporting characteristics consistent with binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, and similar conditions) were recruited through an advertisement on the website of the UK's national eating disorder charity, . The intervention, called , comprised 12 sessions over 8-12 weeks delivered autonomously (i.e., without external support). Participants completed self-report outcome measures of eating disorder features and secondary impairment at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up.
Most participants identified as female, White, and were living in the United Kingdom. Most participants (85%) self-reported features that resembled binge eating disorder, and the rest self-reported features that resembled bulimia nervosa (8%) and atypical bulimia nervosa (7%). On average, participants reported that the onset of their eating disorder was more than twenty years ago. Sixty-three percent of the participants completed (i.e., completed active treatment sessions). Those who completed all sessions and the post-intervention assessment ( = 55, 50%) reported significant decreases in binge eating, eating disorder psychopathology, and secondary impairment at post-intervention. These improvements were maintained at follow-up. Large effect sizes were observed for all these outcomes using a completer analysis and post-intervention data ( = 0.91-1.43). Significant improvements were also observed for all outcomes at post-intervention in the intent-to-treat analysis, with medium-to-large effect sizes.
A substantial proportion of those who completed and the post-intervention assessment experienced marked improvements. This provides promising data to support the conduct of a fully powered trial to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of autonomous .
只有少数饮食失调患者接受循证心理治疗。对于那些反复出现暴饮暴食的患者来说尤其如此,因为暴饮暴食带来的羞耻感影响了他们寻求帮助,而且提供心理治疗的治疗师短缺。以数字程序为主导的干预措施有可能克服这两个障碍。
本研究考察了一种直接基于强化认知行为疗法(CBT-E)的新型数字程序主导干预措施的可接受性和有效性,CBT-E是一种经实证支持的饮食失调心理治疗方法。
通过在英国国家饮食失调慈善机构的网站上刊登广告,招募了110名反复出现暴饮暴食的成年人(自我报告的特征与暴饮暴食障碍、神经性贪食症及类似病症相符)。名为 的干预措施包括在8至12周内进行12次自主授课(即无需外部支持)。参与者在基线、干预后和6个月随访时完成饮食失调特征和继发性损害的自我报告结局测量。
大多数参与者为女性、白人,居住在英国。大多数参与者(85%)自我报告的特征类似于暴饮暴食障碍,其余参与者自我报告的特征类似于神经性贪食症(8%)和非典型神经性贪食症(7%)。平均而言,参与者报告其饮食失调的发病时间超过20年前。63%的参与者完成了 (即完成了积极治疗课程)。完成所有课程和干预后评估的参与者(n = 55,50%)报告干预后暴饮暴食、饮食失调精神病理学和继发性损害显著减少。这些改善在随访时得以维持。使用完成者分析和干预后数据(Cohen's d = 0.91 - 1.43)观察到所有这些结局的效应量都很大。在意向性分析中,干预后所有结局也观察到显著改善,效应量为中到大型。
完成 和干预后评估的相当一部分参与者有显著改善。这为支持开展一项充分有力的试验以测试自主 的临床效果和成本效益提供了有前景的数据。