Suppr超能文献

“主动咨询”的两种方式:迈向运作良好的临床伦理咨询

Two Approaches of 'Proactive Consultation': Towards Well-Functioning Clinical Ethics Consultation.

作者信息

Kogetsu Atsushi, Koimizu Jungen

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Aug 15;17(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00302-8. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

In recent years, the global need for clinical ethics consultation services (CECS) has increased to address ethical challenges, dilemmas, and moral distress in clinical environments. In Japan, many hospitals have introduced CECS over the past decade, but few such services work effectively because of the small number of consultations. To address this, we propose two proactive ethics consultation methods: inter-professional ethics rounds and patient note reviews. This paper provides a detailed explanation of these methods, complete with scenarios based on actual cases. These methods can make CECS 'well-functioning' by shifting the starting points of consultation from consultees to CECS providers. We then examine the impact and value of proactive ethics consultation as well as four critical factors for its success including attitude, positioning, and competency of proactive consultation teams. We believe our suggestions will provide valuable insights for future clinical ethics consultations and stimulate academic debate about what constitutes a 'well-functioning' CECS.

摘要

近年来,全球对临床伦理咨询服务(CECS)的需求不断增加,以应对临床环境中的伦理挑战、困境和道德困扰。在日本,许多医院在过去十年中引入了CECS,但由于咨询数量较少,很少有此类服务能有效运作。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了两种积极主动的伦理咨询方法:跨专业伦理查房和病历审查。本文详细解释了这些方法,并配有基于实际案例的场景。这些方法可以通过将咨询的起点从被咨询者转移到CECS提供者,使CECS“有效运作”。然后,我们研究了积极主动的伦理咨询的影响和价值,以及其成功的四个关键因素,包括积极主动咨询团队的态度、定位和能力。我们相信我们的建议将为未来的临床伦理咨询提供有价值的见解,并激发关于什么构成“有效运作”的CECS的学术辩论。

相似文献

3
Ethical case interventions for adult patients.针对成年患者的伦理案例干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 22;7(7):CD012636. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012636.pub2.
5
The role of online ethics consultation on mental health.在线伦理咨询在心理健康中的作用。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Aug;27(5):1261-1269. doi: 10.1177/0969733020906596. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
7
Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.评估临床伦理委员会的有效性:系统评价。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):135-151. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09986-9. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

6
A Team-Based Early Action Protocol to Address Ethical Concerns in the Intensive Care Unit.
Am J Crit Care. 2020 Jan 1;29(1):49-61. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2020915.
7
Objectives and outcomes of clinical ethics services: a Delphi study.临床伦理服务的目标和结果:德尔菲研究。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;45(12):761-769. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105203. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
10
What is 'moral distress'? A narrative synthesis of the literature.什么是“道德困境”?文献综述。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 May;26(3):646-662. doi: 10.1177/0969733017724354. Epub 2017 Oct 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验