• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情凸显了临床伦理委员会在非洲的重要作用。

COVID-19 underscores the important role of Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 25;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00696-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-021-00696-2
PMID:34563181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8465788/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has magnified pre-existing challenges in healthcare in Africa. Long-standing health inequities, embedded in the continent over centuries, have been laid bare and have raised complex ethical dilemmas. While there are very few clinical ethics committees (CECs) in Africa, the demand for such services exists and has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. The views of African healthcare professionals or bioethicists on the role of CECs in Africa have not been explored or documented previously. In this study, we aim to explore such perspectives, as well as the challenges preventing the establishment of CECs in Africa.

METHODS

Twenty healthcare professionals and bioethicists from Africa participated in this qualitative study that utilized in-depth semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions. Themes were identified through thematic analysis of interviews and open-ended responses.

RESULTS

Kenya and South Africa are the only countries on the continent with formal established CECs. The following themes emerged from this qualitative study: (1) Lack of formal CECs and resolution of ethical dilemmas; (2) Role of CECs during COVID-19; (3) Ethical dilemmas presented to CECs pre-COVID-19; (4) Lack of awareness of CECs; (5) Lack of qualified bioethicists or clinical ethicists; (6) Limited resources to establish CECs; (7) Creating interest in CECs and networking.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illustrates the importance of clinical ethics education among African HCPs and bioethicists, more so now when COVID-19 has posed a host of clinical and ethical challenges to public and private healthcare systems. The challenges and barriers identified will inform the establishment of CECs or clinical ethics consultation services (CESs) in the region. The study results have triggered an idea for the creation of a network of African CECs.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行使非洲的医疗保健领域长期存在的挑战更加凸显。几个世纪以来,非洲一直存在严重的健康不平等问题,这些问题已经暴露无遗,并引发了复杂的伦理困境。尽管非洲几乎没有临床伦理委员会(CEC),但在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对这些服务的需求确实存在并且有所增加。非洲医疗保健专业人员或生物伦理学家对 CEC 在非洲的作用的看法以前没有得到探讨或记录。在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨这些观点,以及在非洲建立 CEC 所面临的挑战。

方法

来自非洲的 20 名医疗保健专业人员和生物伦理学家参加了这项定性研究,该研究采用了对非洲的主题进行了主题分析,包括:(1)缺乏正式的 CEC 和解决伦理困境;(2)CEC 在 COVID-19 期间的作用;(3)COVID-19 之前提交给 CEC 的伦理困境;(4)对 CEC 的认识不足;(5)缺乏合格的生物伦理学家或临床伦理学家;(6)建立 CEC 的资源有限;(7)对 CEC 产生兴趣和建立网络。

结论

这项研究说明了在非洲 HCP 和生物伦理学家中进行临床伦理教育的重要性,尤其是在 COVID-19 对公共和私人医疗保健系统提出了一系列临床和伦理挑战的情况下。确定的挑战和障碍将为该地区建立 CEC 或临床伦理咨询服务(CES)提供信息。研究结果引发了在非洲建立 CEC 网络的想法。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 underscores the important role of Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa.新冠疫情凸显了临床伦理委员会在非洲的重要作用。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 25;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00696-2.
2
Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?非洲的临床伦理委员会:在 RECs/IRBs 的阴影下迷失?
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Nov 18;21(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00559-2.
3
Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees.在 COVID-19 研究中遇到的关键伦理问题:南非研究伦理委员会观点的主题分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Feb 15;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00888-y.
4
Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.评估临床伦理委员会的有效性:系统评价。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):135-151. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09986-9. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
5
Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting.临床伦理委员会在确定优先事项方面的作用和职责。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 1;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0226-5.
6
Ethical advice in paediatric care.儿科保健中的伦理建议。
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Mar;107(3):e18. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322671. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
7
Using symbiotic empirical ethics to explore the significance of relationships to clinical ethics: findings from the Reset Ethics research project.运用共生经验伦理探索关系对临床伦理的意义:重置伦理研究项目的研究结果。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 28;25(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01053-9.
8
A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa.非洲突发公共卫生事件中的伦理审查流程的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 22;25(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01054-8.
9
Clinical ethics committees in nursing homes: what good can they do? Analysis of a single case consultation.养老院临床伦理委员会:它们能做什么?一项案例咨询的分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Feb;29(1):94-103. doi: 10.1177/09697330211003269. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
10
Institutional challenges for clinical ethics committees.临床伦理委员会面临的制度挑战。
HEC Forum. 2011 Sep;23(3):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s10730-011-9160-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-making and ethical dilemmas experienced by hospital physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Czech Republic.捷克共和国新冠疫情期间医院医生所经历的决策与伦理困境
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 4;25(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01133-w.
2
Exploration of clinical ethics consultation in Uganda: a case study of Uganda Cancer Institute.乌干达临床伦理咨询探索:以乌干达癌症研究所为例。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 9;25(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01085-1.
3
Fostering public health ethics awareness among medical students through interactive web-based values exchange learning: A cross-sectional study.通过互动式网络价值观交流学习提高医学生的公共卫生伦理意识:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 27;102(43):e35808. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035808.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?非洲的临床伦理委员会:在 RECs/IRBs 的阴影下迷失?
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Nov 18;21(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00559-2.
2
Allocation of scarce resources in Africa during COVID-19: Utility and justice for the bottom of the pyramid?非洲在 COVID-19 期间稀缺资源的分配:底层民众的效用和公正?
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Mar;21(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12280. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
3
The COVID-19 Crisis and Clinical Ethics in New York City.纽约市的新冠疫情危机与临床伦理
J Clin Ethics. 2020 Fall;31(3):228-232.
4
Critical care triaging in the shadow of COVID-19: Ethics considerations.新冠肺炎疫情阴影下的重症监护分诊:伦理考量。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Apr 16;110(5):355-359.
5
Ethicists, doctors and triage decisions: who should decide? And on what basis?伦理学家、医生与分诊决策:该由谁来做决定?基于何种依据?
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 10. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106499.
6
What Could "Fair Allocation" during the Covid-19 Crisis Possibly Mean in Sub-Saharan Africa?在撒哈拉以南非洲,“公平分配”在新冠疫情危机中可能意味着什么?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):33-35. doi: 10.1002/hast.1129.
7
Ethical Challenges Arising in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD) Task Force.《COVID-19 大流行中出现的伦理挑战:来自生物伦理计划主任协会 (ABPD) 工作组的概述》。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jul;20(7):15-27. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1764138. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Ethical road map through the covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的道德路线图。
BMJ. 2020 May 21;369:m2033. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2033.
9
Latin American healthcare systems in times of pandemic.拉丁美洲大流行时期的医疗保健系统。
Dev World Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(2):69-73. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12262. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
10
Clinical Ethics Consultation in the Transition Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.中东欧转型国家的临床伦理咨询。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):833-850. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00141-z. Epub 2019 Oct 5.