• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

客户在哪里接受美沙酮治疗?探索美沙酮治疗客户的绕过行为:时间、地理和人口因素。

Where Do Clients Receive Methadone Treatment? Exploring Bypassing Behaviors in Methadone Treatment Clients: Temporal, Geographic, and Demographic Factors.

作者信息

Alibrahim Abdullah, Marsh Jeanne C, Amaro Hortensia, Kong Yinfei, Khachikian Tenie, Guerrero Erick

机构信息

Industrial & Management Systems Engineering, College of Engineering & Petroleum, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait.

Geo-Health Lab, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait, Kuwait.

出版信息

Subst Use. 2025 Jan 30;19:29768357241312554. doi: 10.1177/29768357241312554. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/29768357241312554
PMID:39896215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11783500/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined where clients receive methadone treatment for opioid use disorder relative to their residences. Commuting time affects access to care, and anecdotal evidence suggests clients often bypass closer methadone providers. This study quantifies (a) bypass patterns in Los Angeles County, (b) gender, age, and ethnoracial differences in bypassing, and (c) links between bypassing and facility attributes.

METHODS

Using retrospective multiyear analysis, we matched opioid treatment episodes with commuting times between clients' ZIP codes and treatment facilities. From 16 972 outpatient episodes (2010-2017), data were paired with Google Maps commuting estimates. The study covered 32 methadone facilities and 8627 unique clients. We determined the difference in driving time (a proxy for commuting time) from the nearest (bypassed) provider to the provider where the client was treated, deriving bypass and extended commute rates. We compared the rates of a scaled bypassing variable across racial, ethnic, and gender groups. We examined rates by grouping and by facility characteristics of the closest provider.

RESULTS

Bypassing occurred in 48.9% of episodes; 21.0% involved extra commute time of 5+ minutes beyond the closest facility. Bypass rates varied significantly across racial, ethnic, and gender groups. Black or African American clients showed higher bypass rates than non-Latino white clients. Latino female clients had lower rates and shorter commutes than Latino male clients ( < .01). Larger methadone facilities experienced fewer bypassing and Black clients were found to typically bypass in favor of providers with longer wait times than other groups in the study.

IMPLICATIONS

This is the first study investigating client and facility characteristics relating to methadone treatment bypassing in a major U.S. care system. The results highlight significant bypass rates affecting efficient access. Findings have implications for opioid treatment system design, particularly to improve access to quality care for underserved communities.

摘要

背景

很少有研究考察阿片类物质使用障碍患者接受美沙酮治疗的地点与他们住所的相对关系。通勤时间会影响获得治疗的机会,且有传闻证据表明患者常常绕过距离更近的美沙酮治疗机构。本研究量化了:(a)洛杉矶县的绕过模式;(b)绕过行为中的性别、年龄和种族差异;以及(c)绕过行为与机构属性之间的联系。

方法

通过回顾性多年分析,我们将阿片类物质治疗事件与患者邮政编码区和治疗机构之间的通勤时间进行匹配。从16972例门诊治疗事件(2010 - 2017年)中,将数据与谷歌地图通勤估算值进行配对。该研究涵盖了32家美沙酮治疗机构和8627名不同的患者。我们确定了从最近(被绕过)的治疗机构到患者实际接受治疗的机构的驾车时间(通勤时间的替代指标)差异,得出绕过率和延长通勤率。我们比较了不同种族、民族和性别组之间的缩放后绕过变量率。我们按分组以及最近治疗机构的特征来检查比率。

结果

48.9%的治疗事件存在绕过情况;21.0%涉及比距离最近的机构额外多5分钟及以上的通勤时间。绕过率在不同种族、民族和性别组之间有显著差异。黑人或非裔美国患者的绕过率高于非拉丁裔白人患者。拉丁裔女性患者的绕过率较低且通勤距离比拉丁裔男性患者短(P < 0.01)。规模较大的美沙酮治疗机构的绕过情况较少,且发现黑人患者通常会绕过,而选择等待时间比研究中的其他组更长的治疗机构。

启示

这是第一项在美国主要医疗系统中调查与美沙酮治疗绕过相关的患者和机构特征的研究。结果凸显了影响有效治疗机会的显著绕过率。研究结果对阿片类物质治疗系统设计有启示,特别是对于改善服务不足社区获得优质治疗的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/9f01c070a6ad/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/5cd05c103d50/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/3d5e4586d6b1/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/8bc1c7df7184/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/dd4204a41630/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/bac6399dcfd8/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/9f01c070a6ad/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/5cd05c103d50/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/3d5e4586d6b1/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/8bc1c7df7184/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/dd4204a41630/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/bac6399dcfd8/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652c/11783500/9f01c070a6ad/10.1177_29768357241312554-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Where Do Clients Receive Methadone Treatment? Exploring Bypassing Behaviors in Methadone Treatment Clients: Temporal, Geographic, and Demographic Factors.客户在哪里接受美沙酮治疗?探索美沙酮治疗客户的绕过行为:时间、地理和人口因素。
Subst Use. 2025 Jan 30;19:29768357241312554. doi: 10.1177/29768357241312554. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Gender disparities in access and retention in outpatient methadone treatment for opioid use disorder in low-income urban communities.在低收入城市社区中,门诊美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的机会和保留方面存在性别差距。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Aug;127:108399. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108399. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
3
Gender disparities in opioid treatment progress in methadone versus counseling.美沙酮与咨询治疗中阿片类药物治疗进展的性别差异。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Jun 23;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00389-4.
4
Disparities in expected driving time to opioid treatment and treatment completion: findings from an exploratory study.预期到达阿片类药物治疗和治疗完成的驾驶时间差异:一项探索性研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 11;22(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07886-7.
5
Association of Racial/Ethnic Segregation With Treatment Capacity for Opioid Use Disorder in Counties in the United States.美国各县种族/民族隔离与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗能力的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203711. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3711.
6
An intervention trial targeting methadone maintenance treatment providers to improve clients' treatment retention in China.一项针对美沙酮维持治疗提供者的干预试验,旨在提高中国患者的治疗保留率。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
7
Identifying gender differences in risk profiles and in opioid treatment outcomes in Los Angeles County.确定洛杉矶县风险特征和阿片类药物治疗结果中的性别差异。
Eval Program Plann. 2023 Apr;97:102240. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102240. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
8
Differences in the delivery of medications for opioid use disorder during hospitalization by racial categories: A retrospective cohort analysis.按种族类别分析住院期间阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的差异:回顾性队列分析。
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):1251-1259. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2022.2074601.
9
Buprenorphine and methadone treatment for opioid dependence by income, ethnicity and race of neighborhoods in New York City.纽约市按社区收入、种族和族裔划分的丁丙诺啡和美沙酮治疗阿片类药物依赖情况
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jul 1;164:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 May 4.
10
Factors affecting problem-solving court team decisions about medications for opioid use disorder.影响问题解决型法庭团队对阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗决策的因素。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Jan;168:209525. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209525. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in expected driving time to opioid treatment and treatment completion: findings from an exploratory study.预期到达阿片类药物治疗和治疗完成的驾驶时间差异:一项探索性研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 11;22(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07886-7.
2
Spatial proximity and access to buprenorphine or methadone treatment for opioid use disorder in a sample of people misusing opioids in Southern California.在南加州滥用阿片类药物的人群样本中,阿片类药物使用障碍患者接受丁丙诺啡或美沙酮治疗的空间接近程度和可及性。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jan;132:108634. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108634. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
3
Association of Racial/Ethnic Segregation With Treatment Capacity for Opioid Use Disorder in Counties in the United States.
美国各县种族/民族隔离与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗能力的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203711. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3711.
4
Spatial access to opioid treatment program and alcohol and cannabis outlets: analysis of missed doses of methadone during the first, second, and third 90 days of treatment.阿片类药物治疗方案和酒精及大麻销售点的空间可达性:治疗的第 1、2、3 个 90 天期间美沙酮漏服的分析。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2020;46(1):78-87. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1620261. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
5
The Role of Primary Care in Improving Access to Medication-Assisted Treatment for Rural Medicaid Enrollees with Opioid Use Disorder.初级保健在改善农村医疗补助计划参保者阿片类药物使用障碍患者获得药物辅助治疗方面的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):936-943. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04943-6. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
6
Effects of Distance to Treatment on Subsequent Alcohol Consumption.与治疗地点的距离对后续酒精摄入量的影响。
Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2018;25(2):173-180. doi: 10.1080/09687637.2016.1189875. Epub 2016 Nov 6.
7
What patients think about choice in healthcare? A study on primary care services in Finland.患者如何看待医疗保健中的选择?芬兰初级保健服务的一项研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(4):463-470. doi: 10.1177/1403494817731488. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
Patient Mobility for Elective Secondary Health Care Services in Response to Patient Choice Policies: A Systematic Review.针对患者选择政策的选择性二级医疗保健服务中的患者流动性:一项系统综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Aug;74(4):379-403. doi: 10.1177/1077558716654631. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Do patients with gastrointestinal cancer want to decide where they have tests and surgery? A questionnaire study of provider choice.胃肠道癌症患者希望决定在哪里进行检查和手术吗?一项关于提供者选择的问卷调查研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Sep;25(9):696-703. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004194. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
10
Patient choice of a hospital: implications for health policy and management.患者对医院的选择:对卫生政策和管理的影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27(2):152-64. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2012-0119.