• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义暴发性感染:评估低血压作为诊断标准的效用。

Defining Fulminant Infections: Assessing the Utility of Hypotension as a Diagnostic Criterion.

作者信息

Chua Hubert C, Eubank Taryn A, Lee Allen, Rao Krishna, Jo Jinhee, Garey Kevin W, Gonzales-Luna Anne J

机构信息

Division of Pharmacy Practice, Arnold and Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy, Long Island University, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 22;12(2):ofaf033. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf033. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf033
PMID:39896986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11783783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fulminant infection (FCDI) is associated with a 30%-40% mortality rate. Guideline definitions for FCDI severity classification include ileus, megacolon, shock, or hypotension. However, no hypotension definition is provided, making application of the definition challenging. The objective of this study was to assess optimal hypotension definitions for FCDI severity criteria.

METHODS

This was a multicenter cohort study involving 1172 hospitalized patients diagnosed with infection (CDI) from 2015 to 2022 (Houston cohort). Patients were assessed for a composite endpoint of colectomy or mortality within 30 days of diagnosis. The ability of the CDI severity criteria to predict the composite endpoint was assessed using 2 definitions of hypotension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≤90 mm Hg and mean arterial pressure [MAP] ≤65 mm Hg) through multivariable regression models. A separate CDI cohort of 494 hospitalized patients validated the results (Midwest cohort).

RESULTS

The composite endpoint was similar in the Houston cohort (98 patients [8.4%]) and the Midwest cohort (26 patients [5.3%]). Using either a MAP ≤65 mm Hg or SPB ≤90 mm Hg as criteria for hypotension was the best-performing model in both the development and validation cohorts. Removal of hypotension was the worst-performing model in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusion of hypotension, defined as SBP ≤90 mm Hg or MAP ≤65 mm Hg, was an important component of FCDI severity criteria, significantly improving the predictive ability to identify FCDI patients at risk for poor outcomes.

摘要

背景

暴发性艰难梭菌感染(FCDI)的死亡率为30%-40%。FCDI严重程度分类的指南定义包括肠梗阻、巨结肠、休克或低血压。然而,未提供低血压的定义,这使得该定义的应用具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估FCDI严重程度标准的最佳低血压定义。

方法

这是一项多中心队列研究,纳入了2015年至2022年期间1172例诊断为艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的住院患者(休斯敦队列)。评估患者在诊断后30天内的结肠切除术或死亡的复合终点。通过多变量回归模型,使用两种低血压定义(收缩压[SBP]≤90 mmHg和平均动脉压[MAP]≤65 mmHg)评估CDI严重程度标准预测复合终点的能力。另一个包含494例住院CDI患者的队列验证了结果(中西部队列)。

结果

休斯敦队列(98例患者[8.4%])和中西部队列(26例患者[5.3%])的复合终点相似。在开发队列和验证队列中,使用MAP≤65 mmHg或SBP≤90 mmHg作为低血压标准是表现最佳的模型。在两个队列中,去除低血压标准是表现最差的模型。

结论

将低血压定义为SBP≤90 mmHg或MAP≤65 mmHg,是FCDI严重程度标准的重要组成部分,显著提高了识别预后不良FCDI患者的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da7/11783783/502141a4c65c/ofaf033f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da7/11783783/17d66b415f72/ofaf033f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da7/11783783/665c52cacc4d/ofaf033f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da7/11783783/502141a4c65c/ofaf033f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da7/11783783/17d66b415f72/ofaf033f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da7/11783783/665c52cacc4d/ofaf033f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da7/11783783/502141a4c65c/ofaf033f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Defining Fulminant Infections: Assessing the Utility of Hypotension as a Diagnostic Criterion.定义暴发性感染:评估低血压作为诊断标准的效用。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 22;12(2):ofaf033. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf033. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
External Validation and Comparison of Clostridioides difficile Severity Scoring Systems.艰难梭菌严重程度评分系统的外部验证和比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 10;74(11):2028-2035. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab737.
3
Systemic Inflammatory Mediators Are Effective Biomarkers for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Clostridioides difficile Infection.系统炎症介质是预测艰难梭菌感染不良结局的有效生物标志物。
mBio. 2020 May 5;11(3):e00180-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00180-20.
4
Surgical Infection Society Guidelines for Total Abdominal Colectomy versus Diverting Loop Ileostomy with Antegrade Intra-Colonic Lavage for the Surgical Management of Severe or Fulminant, Non-Perforated Colitis.外科感染学会关于全腹部结肠切除术与逆行经结肠腔内灌洗回肠造口术治疗严重或暴发性、非穿孔性结肠炎的手术治疗指南。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Mar;23(2):97-104. doi: 10.1089/sur.2021.126. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
5
Development and validation of a simple and robust model to predict 30-day mortality in patients with -associated enterocolitis.开发和验证一种简单而强大的模型,以预测与相关的结肠炎患者的 30 天死亡率。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000468.
6
Clinical management of severe, fulminant, and refractory infection.严重、暴发性和难治性感染的临床管理。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 Apr;18(4):323-333. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1730814. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Clinical factors associated with development of severe-complicated Clostridium difficile infection.与严重复杂性艰难梭菌感染发展相关的临床因素。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;11(11):1466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.050. Epub 2013 May 20.
8
Laboratory markers predictive of fulminant infection refractory to fluid resuscitation.预测对液体复苏难治的暴发性感染的实验室指标。
Infect Prev Pract. 2021 Feb 15;3(2):100127. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100127. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Treatment of Severe and Fulminnant Clostridioides difficile Infection.重度和暴发性艰难梭菌感染的治疗
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;17(4):524-533. doi: 10.1007/s11938-019-00262-1.
10
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Fulminant Clostridioides Difficile Infection: A Combined Medical and Surgical Case Series.粪菌移植治疗暴发性艰难梭菌感染:一个内外科联合病例系列
Cureus. 2023 Feb 14;15(2):e34998. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34998. eCollection 2023 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The burden of CDI in the United States: a multifactorial challenge.美国 CDI 负担:多因素挑战。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08096-0.
2
A Predictive Model to Identify Complicated Infection.一种用于识别复杂感染的预测模型。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 2;10(2):ofad049. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad049. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Risk Factors Associated with Severe Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Cancer.癌症患者中与严重艰难梭菌感染相关的危险因素
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Jan;12(1):209-225. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00722-9. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
Impact of Clostridioides Difficle Infection and its Therapy on Nutritional Status.艰难梭菌感染及其治疗对营养状况的影响。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2022 Aug;24(8):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s11894-022-00846-5. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
5
Validation of Clinical Risk Models for Clostridioides difficileAttributable Outcomes.临床风险模型对艰难梭菌感染相关结局的验证。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jul 19;66(7):e0067622. doi: 10.1128/aac.00676-22. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
6
Fulminant Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Review of Treatment Options for a Life-Threatening Infection.暴发性艰难梭菌感染:危及生命感染的治疗选择综述
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb;43(1):28-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740973. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
Charlson Comorbidity Index: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties.Charlson 共病指数:临床计量特性的批判性评价。
Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(1):8-35. doi: 10.1159/000521288. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
8
Defining the black box: a narrative review of factors associated with adverse outcomes from severe infection.定义黑匣子:对与严重感染不良结局相关因素的叙述性综述
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 8;14:17562848211048127. doi: 10.1177/17562848211048127. eCollection 2021.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
10
External Validation and Comparison of Clostridioides difficile Severity Scoring Systems.艰难梭菌严重程度评分系统的外部验证和比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 10;74(11):2028-2035. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab737.