Suppr超能文献

分娩期干预随机试验中测量或报告的平等、多样性和包容性特征:一项范围综述

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion characteristics measured or reported in randomised trials of intrapartum interventions: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Hannon Susan, Smith Aoife, Gilmore John, Smith Valerie

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, Leinster, D02, Ireland.

School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, Dublin, Leinster, D04, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2025 Mar 7;7:78. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14012.1. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) has gained discursive momentum across multiple arenas, including in maternal health research. As a preliminary exploration for future discussion and development, we undertook a scoping review to identify the types, frequency, and extent of EDI characteristics that were measured and reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of intrapartum interventions specifically.

METHODS

Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping reviews guided the conduct of the review. The population were women of any parity and risk category who were enrolled in intrapartum RCTs in any birth setting or geographical location. The concept was measured and reported EDI characteristics. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from January 2019 to March 2024. Data were extracted using a pre-designed form. The findings were summarised and narratively reported supported by illustrative tables and graphs.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and forty-seven RCTs from 49 countries were included. Eleven EDI characteristics were measured or reported in at least one RCT, although frequency varied. Religion, for example, featured in three RCTs only, whereas Age featured in 222 RCTs. How the EDI characteristics featured also varied. Race/Ethnicity, for example, was described in 21 different ways in 25 RCTs. Similarly, Education was reported in 62 different ways across 96 RCTs. Ninety RCTs limited inclusion to nulliparous participants only, six RCTs required participants to have a minimum educational level, 127 RCTs had inclusion age cut-offs although 23 different variations of this were noted and 15 RCTs excluded participants on the grounds of disability.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review highlights EDI characteristic measurement and reporting deficits in intrapartum RCTs. There is a critical need for improvements in designing, conducting, and reporting RCTs to incorporate EDI. By adopting more extensive EDI practices a greater understanding of healthcare treatments and innovations leading to enhanced maternal health equity could be achieved.

摘要

背景

平等、多样性和包容性(EDI)在多个领域获得了话语影响力,包括孕产妇健康研究。作为未来讨论和发展的初步探索,我们进行了一项范围综述,以确定在产时干预随机对照试验(RCT)中测量和报告的EDI特征的类型、频率和程度。

方法

乔安娜·布里格斯研究所范围综述的方法学指南指导了本综述的开展。研究对象为在任何分娩环境或地理位置参加产时RCT的任何产次和风险类别的女性。概念为测量和报告的EDI特征。检索了2019年1月至2024年3月期间的CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE和CENTRAL。使用预先设计的表格提取数据。研究结果进行了总结,并通过示例表格和图表进行叙述性报告。

结果

纳入了来自49个国家的247项RCT。至少在一项RCT中测量或报告了11项EDI特征,尽管频率各不相同。例如,宗教仅在3项RCT中出现,而年龄在222项RCT中出现。EDI特征的呈现方式也各不相同。例如,种族/民族在25项RCT中有21种不同的描述方式。同样,教育在96项RCT中有62种不同的报告方式。90项RCT仅将纳入对象限制为初产妇,6项RCT要求参与者具有最低教育水平,127项RCT有纳入年龄截止标准,尽管注意到有23种不同的变化形式,15项RCT以残疾为由排除参与者。

结论

本范围综述突出了产时RCT中EDI特征测量和报告的不足。迫切需要改进RCT的设计、实施和报告,以纳入EDI。通过采用更广泛的EDI实践,可以更好地理解医疗保健治疗和创新,从而提高孕产妇健康公平性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb78/11889400/0ead063c76e5/hrbopenres-7-15502-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验