Autonomy revisited: progress in medical ethics: discussion paper.
作者信息
Brody H
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 1985 May;78(5):380-7. doi: 10.1177/014107688507800507.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Autonomy revisited: progress in medical ethics: discussion paper.再谈自主性：医学伦理学的进展：讨论文件
J R Soc Med. 1985 May;78(5):380-7. doi: 10.1177/014107688507800507.
2
Anchor and course for the modern ship of casuistry.为决疑论这艘现代之船锚定方向并规划航线。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Summer;3(3):391-402. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100005223.
3
Models of the doctor-patient relationship and the ethics committee: Part One.医患关系模型与伦理委员会：第一部分。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992 Winter;1(1):11-31. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100000050.
4
New voices ask to be heard in bioethics.生物伦理学领域有新的声音要求被倾听。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992 Spring;1(2):169-77. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100000281.
5
Medical ethics' assault on medical values.医学伦理对医学价值观的冲击。
JAMA. 1984 Jun 1;251(21):2791-3.
6
The reign of autonomy: is the end in sight?自主时代：尽头在望？
Second Opin. 1995 Jan;20(3):75-9.
7
Ethical principles: application to an obstetric case.伦理原则：在产科病例中的应用
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1989 May-Jun;18(3):207-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1989.tb00481.x.
8
Rethinking medical ethics.
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1982 Jan;27(1):1-8.
9
Contributions of empirical research to medical ethics.实证研究对医学伦理学的贡献。
Theor Med. 1993 Sep;14(3):197-210. doi: 10.1007/BF00995162.
10
Nursing ethics and medical ethics.护理伦理与医学伦理。
J Med Ethics. 1986 Sep;12(3):115-6, 122. doi: 10.1136/jme.12.3.115.
引用本文的文献
1
Ethical and Policy Implications of Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities in Sleep Health.种族和民族的医疗保健差异对睡眠健康的伦理和政策影响。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Aug;11(4):2509-2515. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01716-0. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Does it matter whether physicians' recommendations are given early or late in the decision-making process? An experimental study among patients with schizophrenia.医生的建议在决策过程中给出的早晚有关系吗？一项针对精神分裂症患者的实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 16;6(9):e011282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011282.
3
Education and role modelling for clinical decisions with female cancer patients.针对女性癌症患者临床决策的教育与行为示范。
Health Expect. 2004 Dec;7(4):303-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00294.x.
4
Mental capacity, legal competence and consent to treatment.精神能力、法律行为能力与治疗同意
J R Soc Med. 2004 Sep;97(9):415-20. doi: 10.1177/014107680409700902.
5
Do the British Guidelines for Asthma Management facilitate concordance?《英国哮喘管理指南》是否促进了医患共同决策？
Health Expect. 2004 Mar;7(1):74-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-7625.2003.00256.x.
6
Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial.促进患者参与并缩短癌症会诊时间：一项随机试验
Br J Cancer. 2001 Nov 2;85(9):1273-9. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2073.
7
The physician-patient relationship: models and criticisms.医患关系：模式与批评
Theor Med. 1987 Jun;8(2):205-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00539756.
8
Promoting prevention and patient autonomy: discussion paper.促进预防与患者自主：讨论文件
J R Soc Med. 1987 Aug;80(8):502-4. doi: 10.1177/014107688708000815.
9
Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.癌症患者：他们对信息的需求以及参与治疗决策的情况。
J R Soc Med. 1989 May;82(5):260-3. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200506.
本文引用的文献
1
Generalization of expertise.专业技能的泛化
Stud Hastings Cent. 1973;1(2):29-40.
2
Can applied ethics be effective in health care and should it strive to be?应用伦理学在医疗保健中能发挥作用吗？它是否应该努力发挥作用？
Ethics. 1983 Jan;93(2):311-9. doi: 10.1086/292436.
3
Autonomy & the refusal of lifesaving treatment.自主性与拒绝救命治疗
Hastings Cent Rep. 1981 Aug;11(4):22-8.
4
Why doctors should intervene.医生为何应进行干预。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1982 Aug;12(4):14-7.
5
The tyranny of principles.原则的专制
Hastings Cent Rep. 1981 Dec;11(6):31-9.
6
A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.医学家长主义的辩护：最大化患者的自主性。
J Med Ethics. 1983 Mar;9(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.1.38.
7
Medical ethics' assault upon medical values.医学伦理对医学价值观的冲击。
JAMA. 1983 Oct 21;250(15):2011-5.
8
Autonomy: a moral good, not a moral obsession.自主性：一种道德善，而非道德执念。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Oct;14(5):40-2.
9
Autonomy's temporary triumph.自主性的暂时胜利。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Oct;14(5):38-40.
10
Doctor-patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research.医患沟通。社会科学研究的临床意义。
JAMA. 1984 Nov 2;252(17):2441-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.252.17.2441.
Zotero 插件