Kaga Tetsuro, Kato Hiroki, Kawaguchi Masaya, Kanayama Tomohiro, Nagano Akihito, Omata Shingo, Noda Yoshifumi, Hyodo Fuminori, Matsuo Masayuki
Department of Radiology, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Department of Tumor Pathology, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Korean J Radiol. 2025 Feb;26(2):169-179. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0885.
To elucidate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics for distinguishing solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) from desmoid tumors (DTs).
A retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven SFT (n = 34; 13 males and 21 females; mean age, 52.0 ± 17.1 years) or DT (n = 32; 11 males and 21 females; mean age, 39.0 ± 21.3 years) was conducted. The two groups were quantitatively compared in terms of the size, signal intensity ratio (SIR), and apparent diffusion coefficient value. For qualitative analysis, the tumor location, boundary, shape, internal uniformity, predominant signal intensity, T1-weighted images (T1WI) characteristics (hyperintense area), T2-weighted images (T2WI) characteristics (hypointense area, marked hyperintense area, flow void, band sign, and yin-yang sign), and contrast-enhanced T1WI characteristics (unenhanced area and degree of enhancement) were compared between the two groups. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted to distinguish between the SFT and DT.
T1 ( = 0.010) and T2 ( = 0.026) SIRs were higher in SFTs than in DTs. Hyperintense areas on T1WI ( < 0.001), marked hyperintense areas on T2WI ( = 0.025), and flow void ( = 0.025) were more frequently noted in SFTs. On T1WI, the solid component predominantly revealed hyperintensity in SFTs and isointensity in DTs ( < 0.001). Indistinct tumor boundary ( < 0.001), hypointense area on T2WI ( < 0.001), and band sign ( < 0.001) were more frequently observed in DTs. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the hyperintense area on T1WI (odds ratio favoring SFT, 12.80, = 0.002) and band sign (odds ratio favoring DT, 0.03; < 0.001) were independent predictors.
MRI characteristics can help distinguish SFT from DT. The presence of a hyperintense area relative to the skeletal muscle on T1WI in SFTs and the band sign on T2WI in DTs are important MRI features.
阐明用于鉴别孤立性纤维瘤(SFT)与韧带样瘤(DT)的磁共振成像(MRI)特征。
对66例经组织病理学证实为SFT(n = 34;男性13例,女性21例;平均年龄52.0±17.1岁)或DT(n = 32;男性11例,女性21例;平均年龄39.0±21.3岁)的连续患者进行回顾性研究。对两组在大小、信号强度比(SIR)和表观扩散系数值方面进行定量比较。对于定性分析,比较两组肿瘤的位置、边界、形状、内部均匀性、主要信号强度、T1加权像(T1WI)特征(高信号区)、T2加权像(T2WI)特征(低信号区、显著高信号区、流空、带状征和阴阳征)以及对比增强T1WI特征(未增强区和增强程度)。进行多步逐步逻辑回归分析以区分SFT和DT。
SFT的T1(P = 0.010)和T2(P = 0.026)SIR高于DT。SFT中T1WI上的高信号区(P < 0.001)、T2WI上的显著高信号区(P = 0.025)和流空(P = 0.025)更为常见。在T1WI上,SFT中实性成分主要表现为高信号,而DT中为等信号(P < 0.001)。DT中更常观察到肿瘤边界不清(P < 0.001)、T2WI上的低信号区(P < 0.001)和带状征(P < 0.001)。多步逐步逻辑回归分析显示T1WI上的高信号区(支持SFT的优势比,12.80,P = 0.002)和带状征(支持DT的优势比,0.03;P < 0.001)是独立预测因素。
MRI特征有助于鉴别SFT与DT。SFT中T1WI上相对于骨骼肌的高信号区以及DT中T2WI上的带状征是重要的MRI特征。