Phifer T J, Gerlock A J, Rich N M, McDonald J C
J Trauma. 1985 Apr;25(4):342-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198504000-00012.
Indications for venous reconstruction after traumatic injury are controversial, partly because of uncertainty of continued patency. We found no reports in the literature of truly long-term results after venous reconstruction. For clarification of this issue, we reviewed femoral venous injuries in a civilian metropolital population over a 20-year period. There were 31 patients with penetrating femoral venous injuries. Twenty-four patients underwent reconstruction. A search for these patients years after reconstruction located only five patients with six reconstructions. Followup venography at 6 to 20 years demonstrated venous patency and functional valves with asymptomatic patients and no clinical evidence of venous insufficiency in all cases excluding a single 1962 repair with a Teflon graft. This study then supports reconstruction rather than ligation after venous trauma. Although small, this series appears to be the only known report of truly long-term results following venous reconstruction.
创伤后静脉重建的适应证存在争议,部分原因是对静脉能否持续通畅存在不确定性。我们在文献中未发现关于静脉重建后真正长期结果的报道。为了阐明这个问题,我们回顾了20年间一个平民大都市人群中的股静脉损伤情况。有31例患者发生股静脉穿透伤。24例患者接受了重建手术。在重建多年后寻找这些患者时,仅找到5例患者,其接受了6次重建手术。6至20年的随访静脉造影显示,除了1962年用聚四氟乙烯移植物进行的一次修复外,所有病例中的患者静脉均通畅且有功能性瓣膜,无症状,也无静脉功能不全的临床证据。这项研究支持静脉创伤后进行重建而非结扎。尽管样本量小,但该系列似乎是唯一已知的关于静脉重建后真正长期结果的报道。