Jin Wenyi, Yang Donglin, Xu Zhe, Song Jiaze, Jin Haijuan, Zhou Xiaoming, Liu Chen, Wu Hao, Cheng Qianhui, Yang Jingwen, Lin Jiaying, Wang Liang, Chen Chan, Wang Zhiyi, Weng Jie
Department of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Precision General Practice and Health Management, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Infection. 2025 Feb 3. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02465-w.
Invasive fungal infections (IFI) represent a significant contributor to mortality among sepsis patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Early diagnosis of IFI is challenging, and currently, there are no predictive tools for identifying sepsis patients who may develop IFI. Our study aims to develop a predictive scoring system to assess the risk of IFI in patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU.
A retrospective collection of data from a total of 549 patients was conducted. Data-driven, clinically knowledge-driven, and decision tree models were used to identify predictive variables for risk of IFI in ICU patients with sepsis. Demographic data, vital signs, laboratory values, comorbidities, medication use, and clinical outcomes were all collected. The optimal model was selected based on model performance and clinical utility to establish a risk score.
Among adult patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU, 127 patients (23.1%) developed IFI. The final data-driven model included four predictive factors, the clinically knowledge-driven model included three predictive factors, and the decision tree model included two. Based on the good performance and clinical utility of the clinically knowledge-driven model, it was chosen as the optimal risk scoring model (C-statistics: 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.83); Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test P = 0.884). The ICU sepsis patient invasive fungal infection risk (AMI) score, created based on the clinically knowledge-driven model, includes mechanical ventilation, application of immunosuppressants, and the types of antibiotics used. The C-statistics for this risk score was 0.79 (95% CI:0.75-0.84) with good calibration (H-L test P = 0.992 and see calibration curve: Fig. 2). Moreover, in terms of clinical utility, the decision curve analysis for AMI showed a favorable net benefit.
The application of the AMI score can effectively distinguish whether ICU sepsis patients will develop IFI, which is beneficial for clinicians to formulate targeted and timely preventive and treatment measures based on the risk of IFI.
侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)是重症监护病房(ICU)中脓毒症患者死亡的重要原因。IFI的早期诊断具有挑战性,目前尚无用于识别可能发生IFI的脓毒症患者的预测工具。我们的研究旨在开发一种预测评分系统,以评估入住ICU的脓毒症患者发生IFI的风险。
对总共549例患者的数据进行回顾性收集。采用数据驱动、临床知识驱动和决策树模型来识别ICU脓毒症患者发生IFI风险的预测变量。收集了人口统计学数据、生命体征、实验室值、合并症、药物使用情况和临床结局。根据模型性能和临床实用性选择最佳模型以建立风险评分。
在入住ICU的成年脓毒症患者中,127例(23.1%)发生了IFI。最终的数据驱动模型包括四个预测因素,临床知识驱动模型包括三个预测因素,决策树模型包括两个。基于临床知识驱动模型的良好性能和临床实用性,将其选为最佳风险评分模型(C统计量:0.79(95%置信区间(CI):0.75 - 0.83);Hosmer-Lemeshow(H-L)检验P = 0.884)。基于临床知识驱动模型创建的ICU脓毒症患者侵袭性真菌感染风险(AMI)评分包括机械通气、免疫抑制剂的应用以及所用抗生素的类型。该风险评分的C统计量为0.79(95% CI:0.75 - 0.84),校准良好(H-L检验P = 0.992,见校准曲线:图2)。此外,在临床实用性方面,AMI的决策曲线分析显示出良好的净效益。
AMI评分的应用可以有效区分ICU脓毒症患者是否会发生IFI,这有助于临床医生根据IFI风险制定有针对性的及时预防和治疗措施。