Suppr超能文献

预防性输卵管切除术作为一般人群卵巢癌的预防策略:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prophylactic salpingectomy as a preventative strategy for ovarian cancer in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tang Yuting, Sun Haiying, Fu Peiying, Zhou Ting, Liu Ronghua

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jan;36(1):e8. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The impact of prophylactic salpingectomy on the prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear, particularly in Asian populations where data is lacking. In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, we sought to assess whether prophylactic salpingectomy could reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer in the general population of multiple ethnicities.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to assess the effectiveness of salpingectomy, bilateral salpingectomy (BS), and unilateral salpingectomy (US) in reducing the risk of EOC and evaluating postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The final analyses included 6 eligible trials (5,747,056 patients), including 1 cohort study and 5 case-control studies. The analyses of these studies demonstrated that women who underwent salpingectomy had a significantly reduced risk of EOC compared to those who did not receive salpingectomy (odds ratio [OR]=0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.45-0.89; p=0.007). Five studies (5,746,469 patients) indicated a significant reduction in EOC risk among patients who underwent BS (OR=0.48; 95% CI=0.33-0.69; p<0.001). On the other hand, in the analysis of 4 studies (5,745,887 patients) that examined US, the association with EOC risk was not significant despite the protective trend (OR=0.82; 95% CI=0.64-1.06; p=0.12).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate BS is an effective strategy for reducing the risk of sporadic EOC, but the results did not lead to the same conclusion for patients who underwent US. When a candidate or patient is undergoing a hysterectomy or has other benign diseases, prophylactic BS may be a safe surgical procedure that carries future benefits in terms of EOC risk.

摘要

目的

预防性输卵管切除术对预防上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的影响仍不明确,尤其是在缺乏相关数据的亚洲人群中。在这项系统评价和荟萃分析研究中,我们试图评估预防性输卵管切除术是否能降低多种族普通人群中卵巢癌的发病率。

方法

使用PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和科学网进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估输卵管切除术、双侧输卵管切除术(BS)和单侧输卵管切除术(US)在降低EOC风险及评估术后结局方面的有效性。

结果

最终分析纳入6项合格试验(5747056例患者),包括1项队列研究和5项病例对照研究。这些研究的分析表明,与未接受输卵管切除术的女性相比,接受输卵管切除术的女性患EOC的风险显著降低(优势比[OR]=0.63;95%置信区间[CI]=0.45-0.89;p=0.007)。五项研究(5746469例患者)表明,接受BS的患者中EOC风险显著降低(OR=0.48;95%CI=0.33-0.69;p<0.001)。另一方面,在对4项研究(5745887例患者)进行的检查US的分析中,尽管存在保护趋势,但与EOC风险的关联并不显著(OR=0.82;95%CI=0.64-1.06;p=0.12)。

结论

我们的结果表明,BS是降低散发性EOC风险的有效策略,但对于接受US的患者,结果并未得出相同结论。当候选者或患者正在接受子宫切除术或患有其他良性疾病时,预防性BS可能是一种安全的手术程序,在EOC风险方面具有未来益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7119/11790999/8fce9f0a0251/jgo-36-e8-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验