• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧输卵管切除术可降低普通人群患卵巢癌的风险:一项荟萃分析。

Bilateral salpingectomy can reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in the general population: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yoon Sang-Hee, Kim Soo-Nyung, Shim Seung-Hyuk, Kang Soon-Beum, Lee Sun-Joo

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2016 Mar;55:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.003
PMID:26773418
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The results of recent studies have suggested that high-grade serous ovarian cancer predominantly arises within the fallopian tubes. The reduction of ovarian cancer (OC) risk in women with a history of bilateral salpingectomy (BS) has been reported. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the impact of BS in preventing OC in the general population.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases and CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library for all English-language articles published up to January 2015, using the key words 'ovarian cancer' and 'bilateral salpingectomy.' Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by standard meta-analysis techniques.

RESULTS

Of the 77 studies retrieved, three were included in this meta-analysis, including one cohort study and two population-based case-control studies with 3509 patients who underwent BS and 5,655,702 controls who did not undergo salpingectomy. Over the combined study period, 29 of the 3509 BS patients developed OC compared with 44,006 of the 5,655,702 without salpingectomy. The meta-analysis results based on the fixed effects model revealed a significant decrease in the risk of OC occurrence in the patients who underwent BS relative to the controls (OR=0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.75, I(2)=0%). This pattern was also observed in subgroup analysis for the study type.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that removal of the fallopian tubes is an effective measure to reduce OC risk in the general population. Therefore, prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy should be considered for women who require hysterectomy with benign indications or sterilisation procedures.

摘要

背景

近期研究结果表明,高级别浆液性卵巢癌主要起源于输卵管。据报道,有双侧输卵管切除术(BS)病史的女性患卵巢癌(OC)的风险降低。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定BS对普通人群预防OC的影响。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE数据库以及Cochrane图书馆中的CENTRAL,查找截至2015年1月发表的所有英文文章,使用关键词“卵巢癌”和“双侧输卵管切除术”。通过标准荟萃分析技术计算比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

在检索到的77项研究中,三项被纳入该荟萃分析,包括一项队列研究和两项基于人群的病例对照研究,共有3509例接受BS的患者和5655702例未接受输卵管切除术的对照。在综合研究期间,3509例BS患者中有29例发生OC,而5655702例未行输卵管切除术的患者中有44006例发生OC。基于固定效应模型的荟萃分析结果显示,与对照组相比,接受BS的患者发生OC的风险显著降低(OR=0.51,95%CI 0.35-0.75,I²=0%)。在按研究类型进行的亚组分析中也观察到了这种模式。

结论

我们的结果表明,切除输卵管是降低普通人群OC风险的有效措施。因此,对于因良性指征需要子宫切除术或绝育手术的女性,应考虑预防性双侧输卵管切除术。

相似文献

1
Bilateral salpingectomy can reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in the general population: A meta-analysis.双侧输卵管切除术可降低普通人群患卵巢癌的风险:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Mar;55:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
2
Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study.输卵管切除术与卵巢癌风险:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan 27;107(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju410. Print 2015 Feb.
3
The Role of Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy vs Tubal Occlusion or Ligation for Ovarian Cancer Prophylaxis.机会性双侧输卵管切除术与输卵管阻塞或结扎在预防卵巢癌中的作用。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
4
Efficacy of salpingectomy at hysterectomy to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review.子宫切除术时行输卵管切除术以降低上皮性卵巢癌风险的疗效:系统评价。
BJOG. 2017 May;124(6):880-889. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14601.
5
The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.美国预防性双侧输卵管切除术治疗卵巢癌的效果和安全性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):270.e1-270.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention.机会性输卵管切除术:卵巢癌预防区域倡议的接受度、风险和并发症。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;210(5):471.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
7
Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.延长机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌的安全性证据:来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):172.e1-172.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 May 28.
8
Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.探讨加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省机会性输卵管切除术(salpingectomy)后早绝经的指标:一项队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):221.e1-221.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
9
Tubal ligation and salpingectomy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: a nationwide case-control study.输卵管结扎与输卵管切除术及上皮性卵巢癌和卵巢交界性肿瘤的风险:一项全国性病例对照研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Jan;94(1):86-94. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12516. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
10
Salpingectomy and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Ontario.输卵管切除术与安大略省卵巢癌风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327198. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27198.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: Analyzing clinical practice and key characteristics.实施机会性输卵管切除术以预防卵巢癌:分析临床实践及关键特征。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Aug;104(8):1539-1549. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15128. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Early Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of the Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.卵巢癌的早期诊断:进展、挑战及未来方向综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 7;15(4):406. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040406.
3
Prophylactic salpingectomy as a preventative strategy for ovarian cancer in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
预防性输卵管切除术作为一般人群卵巢癌的预防策略:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jan;36(1):e8. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e8.
4
Ovarian cancer risk reduction by salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery: scoping review.非妇科手术中输卵管切除术降低卵巢癌风险:范围综述
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae161.
5
The Effect of Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve Using Two Different Electrosurgical Instruments: Ultrasonic Shears Versus Bipolar Electrocautery.使用两种不同电外科器械行输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响:超声刀与双极电凝器对比
Cureus. 2024 May 1;16(5):e59434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59434. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Global epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer.上皮性卵巢癌的全球流行病学。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024 May;21(5):389-400. doi: 10.1038/s41571-024-00881-3. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
7
Global, regional, and national quality of care index of cervical and ovarian cancer: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 1990-2019.全球、区域和国家宫颈癌及卵巢癌护理质量指数:1990 - 2019年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02884-9.
8
Beyond Sterilization: A Comprehensive Review on the Safety and Efficacy of Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Preventative Strategy for Ovarian Cancer.超越绝育:机会性输卵管切除术作为卵巢癌预防策略的安全性和有效性的全面综述。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 28;30(12):10152-10165. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120739.
9
Lineage specific extracellular vesicle-associated protein biomarkers for the early detection of high grade serous ovarian cancer.用于高级别浆液性卵巢癌早期检测的谱系特异性细胞外囊泡相关蛋白生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 26;13(1):18341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44050-5.
10
Salpingectomy for the Primary Prevention of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.输卵管切除术用于卵巢癌的一级预防:系统评价。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Nov 1;158(11):1204-1211. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4164.