Rees Vaughan W, Hatsukami Dorothy, Talhout Reinskje
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Tob Control. 2025 Feb 3. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058921.
Cigarette filter ventilation may enhance product appeal, support initiation and sustained smoking, and increase smoking prevalence. We reviewed recent evidence on how filter ventilation affects consumers' perceptions of product appeal and considered product use preferences to inform regulatory options.
PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases were searched up to December 2023. Systematic search strategies used terms based on cigarette filter ventilation, and multiple constructs comprising product appeal and user perceptions.
Two reviewers screened all 917 retrieved titles and abstracts independently and applied a consensus strategy to identify 16 articles that met eligibility criteria.
Extracted data focused on study design, dependent variables or outcomes, and major conclusions.
While remaining popular, awareness and risk perception of ventilated cigarettes is generally low. Cigarettes with filter ventilation are perceived as smoother and less irritating than non-ventilated cigarettes. These modified sensory experiences shape perceptions of reduced health risks. Pack text descriptors and colours convey further information to consumers about smoothness, supporting lowered risk perceptions.
Filter ventilation and its associated marketing continue to influence consumers' perceptions of smoothness creating misperceptions about health risks. Standardised ('plain') packaging regulations are recommended to restrict communication of ventilation themes as well as evidence-based health communications to correct consumer misperceptions about smoothness and health risks. Since filter ventilation has no benefits for public health, policy makers could consider banning filter ventilation or even disallowing filters.
香烟滤嘴通风可能会增强产品吸引力,有助于开始吸烟并持续吸烟,还会提高吸烟率。我们回顾了近期关于滤嘴通风如何影响消费者对产品吸引力认知的证据,并考虑了产品使用偏好,以为监管选择提供参考。
截至2023年12月,检索了PubMed、Embase和PsycINFO数据库。系统检索策略使用了基于香烟滤嘴通风以及包括产品吸引力和用户认知在内的多个概念的术语。
两名评审员独立筛选了所有917条检索到的标题和摘要,并采用共识策略确定了16篇符合入选标准的文章。
提取的数据集中在研究设计、因变量或结果以及主要结论上。
虽然通风香烟仍然很受欢迎,但人们对其的认知和风险感知普遍较低。与无通风滤嘴的香烟相比,有通风滤嘴的香烟被认为口感更柔和,刺激性更小。这些改变后的感官体验塑造了对降低健康风险的认知。包装上的文字描述和颜色向消费者传达了更多关于柔和度的信息,支持了降低风险的认知。
滤嘴通风及其相关营销继续影响消费者对柔和度的认知,造成对健康风险的误解。建议采用标准化(“素面”)包装规定,以限制通风主题的传播以及基于证据的健康宣传,纠正消费者对柔和度和健康风险的误解。由于滤嘴通风对公众健康没有益处,政策制定者可以考虑禁止滤嘴通风甚至禁止使用滤嘴。