Tsze Daniel S, Woodward Hilary A, McLaren Son H, Leu Cheng-Shiun S, Venn April M R, Hu Nina Y, Flores-Sanchez Pamela L, Stefan Bianca R, Shen Sripriya T, Ekladios Mina J, Cravero Joseph P, Dayan Peter S
Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Department of Child Life, NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York.
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.2181.
Intranasal (IN) midazolam is commonly used for procedural sedation in children, but the optimal dose is unclear. Insufficient dosing may result in inadequate sedation, leading to short- and long-term consequences associated with poorly managed procedural pain and distress, whereas doses that are too high may be associated with more adverse events.
To determine the optimal dose of IN midazolam for procedural sedation in children undergoing laceration repair.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, double-blind, adaptive selection randomized clinical trial used the Levin-Robbins-Leu sequential selection procedure and was conducted between September 2021 and May 2024 at a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. Participants were children aged 6 months to 7 years with a simple laceration who required IN midazolam to facilitate the repair. The sequential selection procedure eliminated doses when they failed to achieve a prespecified rate of adequate sedation state compared with the best-performing dose. If more than 1 dose survived elimination, secondary outcomes of remaining doses were compared. Data were analyzed from June to August 2024.
Doses of 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 or 0.5 mg/kg of IN midazolam.
The primary outcome was adequate sedation state, defined as Pediatric Sedation State Scale (PSSS) score of 2, 3, or 4 (of 5) for at least 95% of the procedure; no PSSS score of 0 or 1; procedure start within 17 minutes of IN midazolam administration; and procedure completion. Secondary outcomes included ideal sedation state (PSSS score of 2 or 3 for 100% of the procedure), time to onset of minimal sedation, adverse events, time to recovery, and clinician and caregiver satisfaction.
Following the sequential selection procedure, a total of 101 children (38 [37.6%] female; median [IQR] age, 3 [2-4] years) were enrolled. The 0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg doses were eliminated, with 19 children receiving 0.2 mg/kg and 24 children receiving 0.3 mg/kg. The 0.4- and 0.5-mg/kg doses remained at enrollment completion, with 29 children receiving 0.4 mg/kg and 29 children receiving 0.5 mg/kg. There were no differences in secondary outcomes between the 2 remaining doses and no serious adverse events with any dose.
In this randomized clinical trial, the optimal doses of IN midazolam for procedural sedation in children undergoing laceration repair were 0.4 and 0.5 mg/kg. This finding can inform clinical practice and future studies of IN midazolam for procedural sedation.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04586504.
鼻内(IN)咪达唑仑常用于儿童的操作镇静,但最佳剂量尚不清楚。剂量不足可能导致镇静不足,从而导致与操作疼痛和痛苦管理不善相关的短期和长期后果,而剂量过高可能与更多不良事件相关。
确定用于接受裂伤修复的儿童进行操作镇静的IN咪达唑仑的最佳剂量。
设计、设置和参与者:这项前瞻性、双盲、适应性选择随机临床试验采用了莱文 - 罗宾斯 - 勒序贯选择程序,于2021年9月至2024年5月在一家三级护理儿科急诊科进行。参与者为年龄在6个月至7岁、有简单裂伤且需要IN咪达唑仑以利于修复的儿童。当与表现最佳的剂量相比,剂量未能达到预先设定的充分镇静状态发生率时,序贯选择程序会淘汰这些剂量。如果有多个剂量在淘汰后留存,则比较剩余剂量的次要结局。数据于2024年6月至8月进行分析。
IN咪达唑仑的剂量为0.2、0.3、0.4或0.5mg/kg。
主要结局为充分镇静状态,定义为在至少95%的操作过程中儿科镇静状态量表(PSSS)评分为2、3或4(满分5分);无PSSS评分为0或1;在给予IN咪达唑仑后17分钟内开始操作;以及操作完成。次要结局包括理想镇静状态(在100%的操作过程中PSSS评分为2或3)、最小镇静起效时间、不良事件、恢复时间以及临床医生和护理人员的满意度。
按照序贯选择程序,共纳入101名儿童(38名[37.6%]为女性;中位[四分位间距]年龄为3[2 - 4]岁)。0.2mg/kg和0.3mg/kg的剂量被淘汰,19名儿童接受0.2mg/kg,24名儿童接受0.3mg/kg。在入组完成时,0.4mg/kg和0.5mg/kg的剂量留存,29名儿童接受0.4mg/kg,29名儿童接受0.5mg/kg。剩余的2个剂量在次要结局方面没有差异,且任何剂量均未出现严重不良事件。
在这项随机临床试验中,用于接受裂伤修复的儿童进行操作镇静的IN咪达唑仑的最佳剂量为0.4mg/kg和0.5mg/kg。这一发现可为临床实践以及未来关于IN咪达唑仑用于操作镇静的研究提供参考。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04586504。