Suppr超能文献

通过腹膜透析导管部分再植术成功管理导管损伤或难治性感染:一项回顾性观察研究

Successful management of catheter injury or refractory infection by partial replantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Ryou Seyoung, Ko Eun Jeong, Park Hoon Suk, Chung Byung Ha, Park Cheol Whee, Yang Chul Woo, Kim Yong-Soo, Kim Hyung Duk, Kim Yaeni

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Korea.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2025 Feb 3;26(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03847-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The revised 2023 guidelines from the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) emphasize salvage methods for treating refractory catheter-related infections, or mechanical catheter damage. This approach preserves the existing catheter by manipulating only the outer cuff above the peritoneum, avoiding hemodialysis transfer. We investigated the effectiveness of the partial replantation technique.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study (January 2021 - December 2023), outcomes for nine patients undergoing salvage methods were compared with 58 patients receiving de novo catheter insertion. We assessed exit-site infection (ESI), tunnel infection (TI), peritonitis, and catheter dysfunction. The salvage method entailed distal cutting of the impaired catheter and attaching a new segment using a connector with a PD adaptor and transfer set.

RESULTS

Nine patients (four males, mean age 56 years, average PD duration 66 months) employed the salvage method. Post-procedure, one patient (11.1%) reported ESI, one (11.1%) experienced TI, three (33.3%) developed peritonitis, and two (22.2%) required catheter removal. No procedural complications or catheter dysfunctions were observed. In the control group, ESI occurred in six patients (10.3%), TI in one (1.7%), peritonitis in 11 (19.0%), catheter removal in seven (12.1%), and catheter dysfunction in one (1.7%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistical difference between the groups: ESI (p = 0.306), TI (p = 0.094), peritonitis (p = 0.838), catheter dysfunction (p = 0.694), and catheter removal (p = 0.393).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the non-inferiority and effectiveness of the salvage method compared to de novo insertion in managing ESI or TI and mechanical catheter damage.

摘要

背景

国际腹膜透析学会(ISPD)2023年修订指南强调了治疗难治性导管相关感染或机械性导管损伤的挽救方法。该方法通过仅操作腹膜上方的外部袖套来保留现有导管,避免转为血液透析。我们研究了部分再植技术的有效性。

方法

在这项回顾性单中心研究(2021年1月至2023年12月)中,将9例接受挽救方法的患者的结局与58例接受初次导管插入的患者进行了比较。我们评估了出口处感染(ESI)、隧道感染(TI)、腹膜炎和导管功能障碍。挽救方法包括对受损导管进行远端切割,并使用带有腹膜透析适配器和转移套件的连接器连接一个新的节段。

结果

9例患者(4例男性,平均年龄56岁,平均腹膜透析时间66个月)采用了挽救方法。术后,1例患者(11.1%)报告发生ESI,1例(11.1%)发生TI,3例(33.3%)发生腹膜炎,2例(22.2%)需要拔除导管。未观察到手术并发症或导管功能障碍。在对照组中,6例患者(10.3%)发生ESI,1例(1.7%)发生TI,11例(19.0%)发生腹膜炎,7例(12.1%)拔除导管,1例(1.7%)出现导管功能障碍。Kaplan-Meier分析显示两组之间无统计学差异:ESI(p = 0.306)、TI(p = 0.094)、腹膜炎(p = 0.838)、导管功能障碍(p = 0.694)和导管拔除(p = 0.393)。

结论

本研究支持挽救方法在处理ESI或TI以及机械性导管损伤方面与初次插入相比具有非劣效性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11792682/b883bf4ac54f/12882_2024_3847_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验