• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于预测2型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者聚焦超声消融术后刮宫术中大出血的新型评分模型。

A novel scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage following focused ultrasound ablation surgery in patients with type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy.

作者信息

Yang Jing, Luo Xiaomei, Guo Litong, Cheng Hui, Tang Yi, Song Yiqin, Li Wei, Xiong Li, Gao Fang, Cheng Wei, Zhu Qiaoling

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, P.R. China.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 2025 Dec;42(1):2495362. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2025.2495362. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1080/02656736.2025.2495362
PMID:40296674
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a predictive model for assessing massive hemorrhage risk during dilatation and curettage (D&C) after focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) in Type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 405 Type 2 CSP patients treated at Hunan Maternal and Child Health Hospital (2018-2023) was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors, and a nomogram was constructed. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Ten-fold cross-validation was performed, and external validation was conducted on 327 patients.

RESULTS

Independent risk factors included gestational sac maximum diameter (OR 1.11, 95% CI: [1.07-1.15],  < 0.001), GS blood flow US grade 3 (OR 9.96, 95% CI: [2.65-40.10],  < 0.001), and FUAS-curette time >24 h (OR 17.57, 95% CI: [3.88-84.48],  < 0.001). C-scar thickness and HCG levels were also included in the model as clinically significant factors. The model showed high discriminative ability (AUC 0.910, 95% CI: 0.867-0.953) and was validated through 10-fold cross-validation (mean AUC 0.838). External validation confirmed its robustness (AUC 0.812, 95% CI: 0.742-0.881). Calibration curves and DCA confirmed its accuracy and clinical utility.

CONCLUSION

The predictive model effectively assesses hemorrhage risk in Type 2 CSP patients post-FUAS, offering valuable clinical utility.

摘要

目的

建立一种预测模型,用于评估2型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)患者在聚焦超声消融手术(FUAS)后刮宫术(D&C)期间发生大出血风险。

方法

对湖南省妇幼保健院2018 - 2023年收治的405例2型CSP患者进行回顾性分析。多变量逻辑回归确定独立危险因素,并构建列线图。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型性能。进行十折交叉验证,并对327例患者进行外部验证。

结果

独立危险因素包括孕囊最大直径(比值比[OR]1.11,95%置信区间[CI]:[1.07 - 1.15],P < 0.001)、孕囊血流超声3级(OR 9.96,95% CI:[2.65 - 40.10],P < 0.001)以及FUAS与刮宫间隔时间>24小时(OR 17.57,95% CI:[3.88 - 84.48],P < 0.001)。剖宫产瘢痕厚度和人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)水平也作为具有临床意义的因素纳入模型。该模型显示出较高的辨别能力(AUC 0.910,95% CI:0.867 - 0.953),并通过十折交叉验证得到验证(平均AUC 0.838)。外部验证证实了其稳健性(AUC 0.812,95% CI:0.742 - 0.881)。校准曲线和DCA证实了其准确性和临床实用性。

结论

该预测模型可有效评估2型CSP患者FUAS术后的出血风险,具有重要的临床应用价值。

相似文献

1
A novel scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage following focused ultrasound ablation surgery in patients with type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy.一种用于预测2型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者聚焦超声消融术后刮宫术中大出血的新型评分模型。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2025 Dec;42(1):2495362. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2025.2495362. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
MRI-based scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.基于 MRI 的评分模型预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者刮宫术中大出血。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Oct;48(10):3195-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03968-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
Cesarean section diverticulum area predicting the intraoperative hemorrhage at suction curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy after focused ultrasound ablation surgery.聚焦超声消融术后剖宫产瘢痕妊娠吸刮术中剖宫产憩室区域对术中出血的预测
Int J Hyperthermia. 2025 Dec;42(1):2468757. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2025.2468757. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.超声引导下刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):707-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
5
[Clinical effect and influencing factors of focused ultrasound ablation surgery combined with suction curettage for the treatment of mass-type cesarean scar pregnancy].聚焦超声消融手术联合刮宫术治疗团块型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效及影响因素
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 25;57(4):253-258. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210902-00483.
6
Predictive nomogram of ultrasound indicators for the termination outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠终止结局超声指标的预测列线图
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82894-7.
7
The value of cesarean scar diverticulum in diagnosis of adverse events during dilatation and curettage in patient with cesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕憩室在诊断剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者刮宫术中不良事件的价值。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;168(2):525-534. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15882. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
8
A prediction nomogram for residual after negative pressure aspiration for endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.内源性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠负压吸宫术后残留的预测列线图:一项回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2.
9
Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage at different time intervals for Cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective study.高强度聚焦超声联合超声引导下清宫术不同时间间隔治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效及安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2024;41(1):2388653. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2024.2388653. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
10
Quantitative risk assessment to guide the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.定量风险评估以指导剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的治疗。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Oct;139(1):78-83. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12240. Epub 2017 Jul 20.