• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 MRI 的评分模型预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者刮宫术中大出血。

MRI-based scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Oct;48(10):3195-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03968-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-023-03968-0
PMID:37358602
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To construct a scoring model based on MRI signs to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MRIs of CSP patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital between February 2020 and July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The included patients were randomly assigned to the training and validation cohorts. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were adopted to identify the independent risk factors for massive hemorrhage (the amount of bleeding ≥ 200 ml) during the dilatation and curettage. A scoring model predicting intraoperative massive hemorrhage was established where each positive independent risk factor was assigned 1 point, and the predictive power of this model was evaluated both in the training and validation cohorts via the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

A total of 187 CSP patients were enrolled, who were divided into the training cohort (31 in 131 patients had massive hemorrhage) and validation cohort (10 in 56 patients had massive hemorrhage). The independent risk factors for intraoperative massive hemorrhage included cesarean section diverticulum area (OR = 6.957, 95% CI 1.993-21.887; P = 0.001), uterine scar thickness (OR = 5.113, 95% CI 2.086-23.829; P = 0.025) and gestational sac diameter (OR = 3.853, 95% CI 1.103-13.530; P = 0.025). A scoring model with a total point of 3 was developed and the CSP patients were divided into low-risk (Total points < 2) and high-risk groups (Total points ≥ 2) for intraoperative massive hemorrhage accordingly. This model possessed high prediction performance both in the training cohort (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.896, 95% CI 0.830-0.942) and validation cohort (AUC = 0.915, 95% CI 0.785-1.000).

CONCLUSION

We first constructed a MRI-based scoring model for predicting intraoperative massive hemorrhage in CSP patients, which could help the decision-making of the patients' therapy strategies. Low-risk patients can be cured by D&C alone to reduce the financial burden, while high-risk patients require more adequate preoperative preparation or consideration of changing surgical approaches to reduce bleeding risk.

摘要

目的

构建基于 MRI 征象的评分模型,以预测剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠(CSP)患者刮宫术中大出血的风险。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 2020 年 2 月至 2022 年 7 月在一家三级转诊医院就诊的 CSP 患者的 MRI 资料。纳入的患者被随机分配到训练集和验证集。采用单因素和多因素 logistic 回归分析确定刮宫术中大出血(出血量≥200ml)的独立危险因素。建立预测术中大出血的评分模型,每个阳性独立危险因素赋值 1 分,并通过训练集和验证集的受试者工作特征曲线评估该模型的预测效能。

结果

共纳入 187 例 CSP 患者,其中训练集 131 例(31 例术中大出血),验证集 56 例(10 例术中大出血)。术中大出血的独立危险因素包括剖宫产憩室面积(OR=6.957,95%CI 1.993-21.887;P=0.001)、子宫瘢痕厚度(OR=5.113,95%CI 2.086-23.829;P=0.025)和孕囊直径(OR=3.853,95%CI 1.103-13.530;P=0.025)。建立了一个总分为 3 分的评分模型,根据术中大出血的总积分将 CSP 患者分为低危(总积分<2)和高危(总积分≥2)两组。该模型在训练集(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.896,95%CI 0.830-0.942)和验证集(AUC:0.915,95%CI 0.785-1.000)中均具有较高的预测性能。

结论

我们首次构建了一种基于 MRI 的评分模型,用于预测 CSP 患者刮宫术中大出血的风险,有助于患者治疗策略的决策。低危患者可单独采用 D&C 治疗,以降低经济负担,而高危患者需要更充分的术前准备或考虑改变手术方式,以降低出血风险。

相似文献

1
MRI-based scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.基于 MRI 的评分模型预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者刮宫术中大出血。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Oct;48(10):3195-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03968-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
2
Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage at evacuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy following uterine artery embolization.子宫动脉栓塞术后剖宫产瘢痕妊娠清宫术中出血的危险因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;123(3):240-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
3
The value of 3-dimensional color Doppler in predicting intraoperative hemorrhage for cesarean scar pregnancy.三维彩色多普勒在预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术中出血方面的价值。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(33):e11969. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011969.
4
Predicting intraoperative hemorrhage during curettage treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy using free-breathing GRASP DCE-MRI.应用自由呼吸 GRASP DCE-MRI 预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠刮宫术中出血。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06188-y.
5
Analysis of risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage of cesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术中出血危险因素分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7327. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007327.
6
The value of cesarean scar diverticulum in diagnosis of adverse events during dilatation and curettage in patient with cesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕憩室在诊断剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者刮宫术中不良事件的价值。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;168(2):525-534. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15882. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
7
Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术中出血的危险因素及出血风险评分系统:一项病例对照研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
8
Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.基于子宫动脉栓塞术的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠管理中,腹腔镜联合宫腔镜与刮宫术的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Sep 24;14:116. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-116.
9
Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.超声引导下刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):707-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
10
Risk factors of persistent cesarean scar pregnancy after dilation and curettage: a matched case-control study.经扩张刮宫术(D&C)后持续性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的危险因素:一项匹配病例对照研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;59(2):237-242. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.01.011.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive model combining radiomics and risk factors for predicting massive hemorrhage in cesarean scar pregnancy during dilatation and curettage.一种结合影像组学和风险因素的综合模型,用于预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠刮宫术中大出血。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2025 Jun 4;14:100661. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100661. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
A prediction nomogram for residual after negative pressure aspiration for endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.内源性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠负压吸宫术后残留的预测列线图:一项回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study.超声引导下清宫术前高强度聚焦超声或子宫动脉栓塞治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效及再次妊娠结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05376-0.
2
Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.评估高强度聚焦超声联合吸引刮除术治疗外源性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;306(3):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06487-3. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
Predictive nomogram of ultrasound indicators for the termination outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy.
剖宫产瘢痕妊娠终止结局超声指标的预测列线图
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82894-7.
4
Risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy surgery: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning prediction model.剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠手术中术中出血的风险:一种可解释的机器学习预测模型的开发与验证
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 29;78:102969. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography on the detection of cesarean scar pregnancy: A meta-analysis.磁共振成像和超声检查对剖宫产瘢痕妊娠检测的诊断性能:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 3;100(48):e27532. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027532.
4
Approaches in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的治疗方法及术中出血的危险因素:一项回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 24;8:682368. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.682368. eCollection 2021.
5
Nomogram development and validation to predict hepatocellular carcinoma tumor behavior by preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.基于术前钆塞酸增强 MRI 预测肝细胞癌肿瘤行为的列线图的建立与验证。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8615-8627. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07941-7. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
6
Exploring the value of cesarean section diverticulum area to predict the safety of hysteroscopic management for cesarean scar pregnancy patients.探讨剖宫产憩室面积预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者宫腔镜管理安全性的价值。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Mar;156(3):488-493. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13682. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
7
Pituitrin local injection versus uterine artery embolization in the management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study.垂体后叶素局部注射与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的回顾性队列研究
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 May;47(5):1711-1718. doi: 10.1111/jog.14720. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
8
Intraplacental Fetal Vessel Diameter May Help Predict for Placental Invasiveness in Pregnant Women at High Risk for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders.胎盘内胎儿血管直径可能有助于预测胎盘侵入性在胎盘植入谱系疾病高危孕妇中的作用。
Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):403-412. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200273. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
9
A novel method for typing of cesarean scar pregnancy based on size of cesarean scar diverticulum and its significance in clinical decision-making.一种基于剖宫产憩室大小的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠分型新方法及其在临床决策中的意义。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 May;46(5):707-714. doi: 10.1111/jog.14226. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
Risk factors of persistent cesarean scar pregnancy after dilation and curettage: a matched case-control study.经扩张刮宫术(D&C)后持续性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的危险因素:一项匹配病例对照研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;59(2):237-242. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.01.011.