• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗结直肠癌的成本效益及再入院率:来自韩国健康保险审查与评估服务数据集的证据

Cost-effectiveness and readmission rates of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: evidence from the health insurance review and assessment service dataset in South Korea.

作者信息

An Sanghyun, Hong Sung Eun, Kim Moo Hyun, Kim Ik Yong

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea.

Review and Assessment Division, Seoul Branch Office, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 Jan 20;12:1543920. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1543920. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1543920
PMID:39901934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11788362/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare and analyze the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery (CRS) for colorectal cancer using health insurance claims data derived from multiple institutions in South Korea as well as the differences in hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission rates related to postoperative complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022 using national health insurance claims data in South Korea. We determined the surgical approach based on the presence or absence of treatment material codes specific to laparoscopic surgery, and divided the patients into the laparoscopic-CRS (lap-CRS) and open-CRS groups.

RESULTS

A total of 34,779 patients were included [open-CRS: 3,262 patients [9.4%]; lap-CRS: 31,517 patients [90.6%]]. The mean LOS was 14.11 and 11.27 days for the open- and lap-CRS groups, respectively ( < 0.001). The mean medical costs were 9,163 USD and 8,963 USD in the open- and lap-CRS groups, respectively ( < 0.001). A total of 1,192 (3.4%) patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge, with a rate of 5.4% (176 cases) and 3.2% (1,016 cases) in the open- and lap-CRS groups, respectively ( < 0.001). Open surgery, male sex, and rectal surgery were identified as factors that increased medical cost.

DISCUSSION

According to this South Korean nationwide population-based study, laparoscopic surgery demonstrated a reduction in LOS, medical costs, and readmission rates compared with open surgery in patients with colorectal cancer.

摘要

引言

我们旨在利用来自韩国多个机构的医疗保险理赔数据,比较和分析腹腔镜与开放结直肠癌手术(CRS)治疗结直肠癌的成本效益,以及住院时间(LOS)差异和与术后并发症相关的30天再入院率。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2020年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在韩国接受结直肠癌根治性切除患者的临床数据,这些数据来自国家医疗保险理赔数据。我们根据是否存在腹腔镜手术特有的治疗材料代码来确定手术方式,并将患者分为腹腔镜CRS(lap-CRS)组和开放CRS组。

结果

共纳入34779例患者[开放CRS:3262例患者(9.4%);lap-CRS:31517例患者(90.6%)]。开放CRS组和lap-CRS组的平均住院时间分别为14.11天和11.27天(<0.001)。开放CRS组和lap-CRS组的平均医疗费用分别为9163美元和8963美元(<0.001)。共有1192例(3.4%)患者在出院后30天内再次入院,开放CRS组和lap-CRS组的再入院率分别为5.4%(176例)和3.2%(1016例)(<0.001)。开放手术、男性性别和直肠手术被确定为增加医疗费用的因素。

讨论

根据这项基于韩国全国人群的研究,与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术在结直肠癌患者中显示出住院时间、医疗费用和再入院率的降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3491/11788362/f4b6e61eedf3/fsurg-12-1543920-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3491/11788362/2305f1869606/fsurg-12-1543920-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3491/11788362/b654c87376fc/fsurg-12-1543920-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3491/11788362/f4b6e61eedf3/fsurg-12-1543920-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3491/11788362/2305f1869606/fsurg-12-1543920-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3491/11788362/b654c87376fc/fsurg-12-1543920-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3491/11788362/f4b6e61eedf3/fsurg-12-1543920-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness and readmission rates of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: evidence from the health insurance review and assessment service dataset in South Korea.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗结直肠癌的成本效益及再入院率:来自韩国健康保险审查与评估服务数据集的证据
Front Surg. 2025 Jan 20;12:1543920. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1543920. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of laparoscopic surgery on the risk for surgical site infections in colorectal resection: results from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service Database.腹腔镜手术对结直肠切除术中手术部位感染风险的影响:来自健康保险审查与评估服务数据库的结果
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020 Jun;98(6):315-323. doi: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.6.315. Epub 2020 May 28.
3
Clinical outcomes and cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients over 80 years.80 岁以上老年结直肠癌患者腹腔镜与开腹手术的临床结局和成本比较。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 6;38(1):160. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04459-w.
4
Clinical and Economic Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Open and Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery.开放和腹腔镜直肠手术强化康复路径的临床及经济影响
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jul;28(7):811-818. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0677. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
5
Nationwide outcomes and costs of laparoscopic and robotic vs. open hepatectomy.腹腔镜和机器人肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的全国性结果和成本。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Aug;13(4):557-565. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0896-0. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.开放与腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的临床及经济结局的全国性评估。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4220-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4732-6. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgical Treatment of Cancer: Value of Minimally Invasive Surgery.癌症手术后的医疗资源利用:微创手术的价值。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7549-7560. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09189-8. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
8
Economic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in Korea.韩国腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的经济结果
Surg Today. 2007;37(2):127-32. doi: 10.1007/s00595-006-3356-9. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
9
Cost-effectiveness comparison of minimally invasive, robotic and open approaches in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.微创手术、机器人手术和开放手术治疗结直肠肿瘤的成本效果比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网状meta 分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 29;38(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04361-5.
10
Evaluation of inflammatory markers as predictors of hospital stay and unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery.评估炎症标志物作为结直肠手术后住院时间和非计划再入院预测指标的作用。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2013 Apr;85(4):198-203. doi: 10.2478/pjs-2013-0030.

引用本文的文献

1
Orienting global surgery initiatives toward advancing minimally invasive surgery in Africa: a commentary based on continent-wide reviews.将全球外科手术倡议导向推进非洲的微创手术:基于全洲范围综述的评论
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02863-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
2
Effect of comorbidity assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index on the length of stay, costs, and mortality among colorectal cancer patients undergoing colorectal surgery.通过查尔森合并症指数评估的合并症对接受结直肠手术的结直肠癌患者住院时间、费用和死亡率的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Feb;39(2):187-195. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2139053. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
3
Clinical and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.
腹腔镜与开放手术治疗老年结直肠癌患者的临床和肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;26(12):2237-2245. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02009-4. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
4
Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Colorectal Cancer Resection for Older Adults: A Population-based Analysis of Long-term Functional Outcomes.老年患者微创与开放结直肠癌切除术的比较:基于人群的长期功能结局分析
Ann Surg. 2023 Feb 1;277(2):291-298. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005151. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
5
Time trends of colorectal cancer incidence and associated lifestyle factors in South Korea.韩国结直肠癌发病率的时间趋势及相关生活方式因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81877-2.
6
Effect of laparoscopic surgery on the risk for surgical site infections in colorectal resection: results from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service Database.腹腔镜手术对结直肠切除术中手术部位感染风险的影响:来自健康保险审查与评估服务数据库的结果
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020 Jun;98(6):315-323. doi: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.6.315. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Korea: Nationwide Data from 2013 to 2018.韩国结直肠肿瘤腹腔镜手术的全国数据:2013-2018 年
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):938-944. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.043. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Thirty-Day Readmission After Elective Colorectal Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Single-Center Cohort Study.择期结肠癌结直肠手术后30天再入院情况:一项单中心队列研究
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Jun;36(3):186-191. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.11.04. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Laparoscopic versus open colectomy: the impact of frailty on outcomes.腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术:虚弱对手术结果的影响。
Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0531-7. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
The Charlson Comorbidity Index as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients.查尔森合并症指数作为老年结直肠癌患者的独立预后因素
Indian J Surg. 2018 Feb;80(1):54-60. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1544-4. Epub 2016 Aug 24.