Prasad K D V, Rao Mruthyanjaya, Vaidya Rajesh, Sriyogi Kottala, Singh Shivoham, Srinivas Ved
Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Hyderabad, India.
Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 20;15:1472885. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1472885. eCollection 2024.
To investigate the relationship between work-life balance and the psychological well-being of metro rail travelers working in the information technology sector. The study also examined occupational stress as a pathway between work-life balance and psychological well-being. The study also investigated the impact of occupational stress and work-life balance on the psychological well-being of metro travelers who work in the information technology sector, modeling lower- and higher-order constructs.
A quantitative survey method was used, and the data were gathered from information technology employees who frequently travel on Metro Rail to commute to the office and return home when the COVID-19 pandemic peaked in India in 2022. A structured questionnaire was developed, and a link was provided to the IT sector employees visiting almost all the metro stations in Hyderabad, an Indian Metro, to measure 8 reflective constructs. The data were gathered via random sampling, and the questionnaires were randomly distributed to the different IT sector companies. The valid responses of 500 participants were analyzed for structural equation modeling. The eight reflective constructs in the study are occupational stress, the 3 constructs of work-life balance-"work interference with personal life, personal life interference with work and work-personal life enhancement"-and the four constructs of psychological well-being autonomy, self-acceptance, positive relations, and environmental mastery.
The SEM results for the lower-order constructs indicate that the impact of occupational stress on psychological well-being was statistically significant ( < 0.005), as were the two constructs of psychological well-being, environmental mastery, and self-acceptance ( < 0.001; < 0.05). With respect to the impact of the work-life balance constructs, the impacts of the WIPL, WPLE, and PLIW work-life balance constructs were statistically significant ( < 0.05; < 0.001, respectively) for all four psychological well-being constructs. Occupational stress partially mediated the relationship between work-life balance and psychological well-being, as both the direct and indirect effects were statistically significant when the higher-order constructs work-life balance and psychological well-being were tested. The direct effects of occupational stress and work-life balance on psychological well-being are statistically significant ( < 0.05, < 0.001).
The authors suggest framing policies to mitigate occupational stress and enhance the psychological well-being and work-life balance of employees in the information technology sector.
研究信息技术领域地铁通勤者的工作生活平衡与心理健康之间的关系。该研究还考察了职业压力作为工作生活平衡与心理健康之间的一种传导途径。该研究还对职业压力和工作生活平衡对信息技术领域地铁通勤者心理健康的影响进行了调查,构建了低阶和高阶结构模型。
采用定量调查方法,数据收集自2022年印度新冠疫情高峰期经常乘坐地铁上下班的信息技术员工。编制了一份结构化问卷,并向访问印度海得拉巴几乎所有地铁站的信息技术部门员工提供链接,以测量8个反映性结构。数据通过随机抽样收集,问卷随机分发给不同的信息技术公司。对500名参与者的有效回复进行结构方程建模分析。该研究中的8个反映性结构包括职业压力、工作生活平衡的3个结构——“工作干扰个人生活、个人生活干扰工作和工作-个人生活增强”,以及心理健康的4个结构——自主性、自我接纳、积极关系和环境掌控。
低阶结构的结构方程模型结果表明,职业压力对心理健康的影响具有统计学意义(<0.005),心理健康的两个结构——环境掌控和自我接纳也是如此(<0.001;<0.05)。关于工作生活平衡结构的影响,工作生活平衡结构中的工作干扰个人生活(WIPL)、工作-个人生活增强(WPLE)和个人生活干扰工作(PLIW)对所有四个心理健康结构的影响均具有统计学意义(分别为<0.05;<0.001)。职业压力部分中介了工作生活平衡与心理健康之间的关系,当对高阶结构工作生活平衡和心理健康进行检验时,直接效应和间接效应均具有统计学意义。职业压力和工作生活平衡对心理健康的直接效应具有统计学意义(<0.05,<0.001)。
作者建议制定政策,以减轻职业压力,提高信息技术领域员工的心理健康水平和工作生活平衡度。