Cong Ping, Song Jiashen, Dong Jianxin, Su Wenyan, Feng Wenhao, Zhang Hongyuan
State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China (The Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jan 20;15:1517917. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1517917. eCollection 2024.
Salinized soil often exhibits high salt content and low nutrient availability, leading to the reduction of soil ecosystem function and crop productivity. Although straw return has profound effects on saline soil improvement, how soil quality index (SQI), soil ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF), and crop yield respond to different organic ameliorants remain unclear. Herein, a field experiment was established to explore the influence of various straw management strategies (no organic ameliorant, CK; corn straw return, CS; and corn straw biochar return; CB) on the saline soil functions and crop productivity. In relation to CK and CB, CS significantly improved SQI by 52% and 35%, respectively. This may be due to the decreased soil salt (especially soluble Na) and increased available nutrients under corn straw return. Furthermore, CS increased soil EMF than CK by 71% and CB by 39%, which was caused by the increased activities of 1,4-β-glucosidase, β-1,4--acetyl-glucosaminidase, and leucine aminopeptidase. The linear model further supported that soil enzyme activities are positively related to available nutrient contents and negatively correlated with salt content. Moreover, the crop yield under CS significantly increased by 22% compared to CK. Also, soil quality positively influenced crop yield, with soil salt and available phosphorus being the primary influencing factors. However, crop yield was not sensitive to soil EMF. In summary, straw return was more beneficial to improving soil quality and crop productivity than biochar in the short term in saline soils.
盐渍化土壤通常具有高盐分含量和低养分有效性,导致土壤生态系统功能和作物生产力下降。尽管秸秆还田对盐渍土改良有深远影响,但土壤质量指数(SQI)、土壤生态系统多功能性(EMF)和作物产量如何响应不同的有机改良剂仍不清楚。在此,开展了一项田间试验,以探究各种秸秆管理策略(不施有机改良剂,CK;玉米秸秆还田,CS;以及玉米秸秆生物炭还田,CB)对盐渍土功能和作物生产力的影响。与CK和CB相比,CS分别显著提高了52%和35%的SQI。这可能是由于玉米秸秆还田下土壤盐分(尤其是可溶性钠)降低以及有效养分增加。此外,CS使土壤EMF比CK提高了71%,比CB提高了39%,这是由1,4-β-葡萄糖苷酶、β-1,4-N-乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶和亮氨酸氨肽酶活性增加所致。线性模型进一步支持土壤酶活性与有效养分含量呈正相关,与盐分含量呈负相关。此外,与CK相比,CS处理下的作物产量显著提高了22%。而且,土壤质量对作物产量有积极影响,土壤盐分和有效磷是主要影响因素。然而,作物产量对土壤EMF不敏感。总之,在盐渍土中,短期内秸秆还田比生物炭更有利于改善土壤质量和作物生产力。