Suppr超能文献

新型小口径治疗性内窥镜在经口内镜下肌切开术治疗食管动力障碍中的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析

Efficacy of a novel small-caliber therapeutic endoscope in peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders: a propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Abe Hirofumi, Tanaka Shinwa, Sakaguchi Hiroya, Ueda Chise, Kinoshita Masato, Hori Hitomi, Nakai Tatsuya, Yoshizaki Tetsuya, Hoki Shinya, Tanabe Hiroshi, Urakami Satoshi, Toyonaga Takashi, Kodama Yuzo

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.

Department of Endoscopy, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2025 Apr;22(2):264-271. doi: 10.1007/s10388-025-01107-w. Epub 2025 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

EG-840TP is a novel small-caliber therapeutic endoscope with a large working channel. We aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy using EG-840TP compared to those using a conventional therapeutic endoscope (GIF-H290T).

METHODS

Patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia and non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders were enrolled between March 2021 and March 2023. Procedure times and other treatment outcomes were compared between patients treated with EG-840TP and GIF-H290T using propensity score matching analysis. In the subgroup analysis, patients were divided into subsets based on myotomy length, morphology, esophageal dilation, and operator skill, and the procedure time was compared between the matched groups.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients were enrolled in this study, and 39 patients treated using each type of scope were matched. The EG-840TP group tended to have a shorter procedure time than the GIF-H290T group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of short-term clinical success or perioperative adverse events. In the subgroup analysis, the procedure time of the EG-840TP group was significantly shorter than that of the GIF-H290T group when patients had a straight esophagus (44 min vs. 54 min, p = 0.0015) and the operator was a non-expert (49 min vs. 64 min, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

POEM using EG-840TP showed procedure time, clinical success, and adverse events equivalent to those of a conventional therapeutic endoscope. However, EG-840TP potentially contributed to a shorter procedure time in patients with a straight esophagus or in non-expert operators than GIF-H290T.

摘要

背景

EG-840TP是一种新型的小口径治疗性内窥镜,具有大工作通道。我们旨在评估与使用传统治疗性内窥镜(GIF-H290T)相比,使用EG-840TP进行经口内镜下肌切开术的治疗效果。

方法

纳入2021年3月至2023年3月期间因贲门失弛缓症和非贲门失弛缓症食管动力障碍接受经口内镜下肌切开术的患者。使用倾向评分匹配分析比较接受EG-840TP和GIF-H290T治疗的患者的手术时间和其他治疗效果。在亚组分析中,根据肌切开术长度、形态、食管扩张和术者技能将患者分为亚组,并比较匹配组之间的手术时间。

结果

本研究共纳入154例患者,每种内窥镜治疗的39例患者进行了匹配。EG-840TP组的手术时间往往比GIF-H290T组短。两组在短期临床成功率或围手术期不良事件方面无显著差异。在亚组分析中,当患者食管笔直时(44分钟对54分钟,p = 0.0015)以及术者为非专家时(49分钟对64分钟,p = 0.031),EG-840TP组的手术时间明显短于GIF-H290T组。

结论

使用EG-840TP进行经口内镜下肌切开术的手术时间、临床成功率和不良事件与传统治疗性内窥镜相当。然而,与GIF-H290T相比,EG-840TP可能有助于缩短食管笔直患者或非专家术者的手术时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0daf/11929706/94f432644862/10388_2025_1107_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验