Su Yu-Cheng, Hsu Yung-Heng, Chou Ying-Chao, Chen I-Jung, Lai Chih-Yang, Yu Yi-Hsun
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
Int J Surg. 2025 Mar 1;111(3):2697-2707. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002272.
Pelvic ring injuries are common in multi-trauma patients and can be life-threatening, necessitating prompt surgical intervention to improve outcomes. However, surgery can lead to complications such as iatrogenic nerve injury. This network meta-analysis aimed to improve outcomes in multi-trauma patients with pelvic ring injuries by evaluating the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injuries, identifying vulnerable nerves, and comparing different fixation methods.
A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to 5 December 2023 revealed 29 comparative studies on the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury in 1561 adult patients with pelvic ring injuries. Data were extracted on study and patient characteristics, iatrogenic nerve injury incidences, and specific nerve injuries. A random-effects model assessed treatment effects, with subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The main outcomes included odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for iatrogenic nerve injuries.
Compared with closed reduction internal fixation, robotic-assisted techniques had the highest, and open reduction internal fixation had the lowest ORs for iatrogenic nerve injuries. The robotic-assisted approach ranked best with an OR of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.02-2.16), while closed reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.21-2.48) and open reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach performed the worst. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was injured in all open reduction internal fixation with anterior approach procedures and in 66.7% of open reduction internal fixation with posterior approach procedures. Meta-regression showed a significantly lower OR for iatrogenic nerve injuries in patients aged >41.4 years in the open reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach group (OR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.001-0.63; P = 0.026) compared with younger patients.
The robotic-assisted technique may result in the fewest iatrogenic nerve injuries during the treatment of pelvic ring injuries. The posterior approach may also reduce the risk of iatrogenic nerve injuries.
骨盆环损伤在多发伤患者中很常见,可能危及生命,需要及时进行手术干预以改善预后。然而,手术可能导致诸如医源性神经损伤等并发症。这项网状Meta分析旨在通过评估医源性神经损伤的发生率、识别易损神经并比较不同的固定方法,来改善骨盆环损伤多发伤患者的预后。
对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Scopus从创刊至2023年12月5日进行系统检索,共纳入1561例骨盆环损伤成年患者医源性神经损伤发生率的29项比较研究。提取了有关研究和患者特征、医源性神经损伤发生率及特定神经损伤的数据。采用随机效应模型评估治疗效果,并进行亚组分析和Meta回归。主要结局指标包括医源性神经损伤的比值比(OR)和置信区间(CI)。
与闭合复位内固定相比,机器人辅助技术导致医源性神经损伤的OR最高,切开复位内固定的OR最低。机器人辅助方法效果最佳,OR为0.22(95%CI:0.02 - 2.16),而前路闭合复位内固定(OR:0.71;95%CI:0.21 - 2.48)和前路切开复位内固定效果最差。在所有前路切开复位内固定手术以及66.7%的后路切开复位内固定手术中,股外侧皮神经均有损伤。Meta回归显示,前路切开复位内固定组中年龄>41.4岁的患者医源性神经损伤的OR显著低于年轻患者(OR:0.02;95%CI:0.001 - 0.63;P = 0.026)。
在骨盆环损伤治疗中,机器人辅助技术可能导致最少的医源性神经损伤。后路手术也可能降低医源性神经损伤的风险。