Baudendistel Sidney T, Rawson Kerri S, Lessov-Schlaggar Christina N, Maiti Baijayanta, Kotzbauer Paul T, Perlmutter Joel S, Earhart Gammon M, Campbell Meghan C
Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, CB 8502, 4444 Forest Park Ave., Suite 1101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, CB 8502, 4444 Forest Park Ave., Suite 1101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, MSC 8111-29-9000, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2025 Feb;122:106445. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106445. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Clinical subtypes in Parkinson's disease including non-motor manifestations may be more beneficial than subtypes based upon motor manifestations alone. Inclusion of gait metrics may help identity targets for rehabilitation and potentially predict development of non-motor symptoms for individuals with Parkinson's disease. This study aims to characterize gait differences across established multi-domain subtypes.
"Motor Only", "Psychiatric & Motor" and "Cognitive & Motor" clinical subtypes were established through motor, cognitive, and psychiatric assessment. Walking was assessed in the "OFF" medication state. Multivariate analysis of variance identified differences in gait domains across clinical subtypes.
The "Motor Only" subtype exhibited the fastest velocity, longest step length, and least timing variability (swing, step, stance), compared to "Psychiatric & Motor" and "Cognitive & Motor" subtypes. Stance time differed across subtypes; "Psychiatric & Motor" subtype had the longest stance time, followed by "Cognitive & Motor", then "Motor only". The "Psychiatric & Motor" group had different asymmetry from the "Cognitive & Motor" subtype, as "Psychiatric & Motor" walked with longer steps on their less-affected side while the "Cognitive & Motor" subtype displayed the opposite pattern. No differences were observed for swing time, step velocity variability, step length variability, width measures, or other asymmetry measures.
Cognitive and Psychiatric subtypes displayed worse gait performance than the "Motor only" group. Stance time and step length asymmetry were different between Psychiatric and Cognitive subtypes, indicating gait deficits may be related to distinct aspects of non-motor manifestations. Gait signatures may help clinicians distinguish between non-motor subtypes, guiding personalized treatment.
帕金森病的临床亚型,包括非运动症状,可能比仅基于运动症状的亚型更具临床意义。纳入步态指标可能有助于确定康复目标,并有可能预测帕金森病患者非运动症状的发展。本研究旨在描述已确立的多领域亚型之间的步态差异。
通过运动、认知和精神评估确定“仅运动型”、“精神与运动型”和“认知与运动型”临床亚型。在“关”药状态下评估步行情况。多变量方差分析确定了不同临床亚型之间步态领域的差异。
与“精神与运动型”和“认知与运动型”亚型相比,“仅运动型”亚型的步行速度最快、步长最长,且时间变异性最小(摆动、步幅、站立)。不同亚型的站立时间存在差异;“精神与运动型”亚型的站立时间最长,其次是“认知与运动型”,然后是“仅运动型”。“精神与运动型”组与“认知与运动型”亚型的不对称性不同,“精神与运动型”在患侧较轻的一侧步长较长,而“认知与运动型”亚型则表现出相反的模式。在摆动时间、步速变异性、步长变异性、步宽测量或其他不对称测量方面未观察到差异。
认知和精神亚型的步态表现比“仅运动型”组更差。精神和认知亚型之间的站立时间和步长不对称性不同,表明步态缺陷可能与非运动症状的不同方面有关。步态特征可能有助于临床医生区分非运动亚型,指导个性化治疗。