Baek Kwangyeol, Skandali Nikolina, Sallie Samantha N, Sonkusare Saurabh, Mandali Alekhya, Ritou Valentin, Casero Violeta, Voon Valerie
School of Biomedical Convergence Engineering, Pusan National University, South Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cortex. 2025 Mar;184:194-208. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.12.019. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
Waiting and stopping are essential and distinct elements of motor response inhibition. Waiting impulsivity has been traditionally studied in humans with choice serial reaction time tasks. Proactive stopping is one form of stopping relevant to waiting impulsivity and the neural substrates underlying their interaction are not well defined.
We conducted two separate, but hierarchical studies. In the first we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a choice reaction time task and a novel proactive stopping task, in N = 41 healthy volunteers to map the overlapping neural circuit involved in waiting impulsivity and proactive stopping. In the second study, we aimed to provide mechanistic and causal evidence that disruption of this circuit with continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; an inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol) affected waiting impulsivity. We recruited N = 51 healthy, right-handed volunteers in a single-blind, randomized, between-subjects design who were randomly allocated to stimulation (N = 26) and sham (N = 25) groups and subsequently performed a choice reaction time task.
In the first study, we showed; 1. a shared neural network comprising the pre- supplementary motor area and bilateral anterior insula underlying both waiting impulsivity and proactive stopping, and 2. activity in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus negatively correlated with waiting impulsivity in trials with additional target onset delay. In the second study, we demonstrated that inactivation of the left inferior frontal gyrus using cTBS significantly increased waiting impulsivity in a choice reaction time task.
Our findings highlight the relevance of task design in assessing motor response inhibition and the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus integrity and related neural circuitry in waiting impulsivity and proactive stopping. We also leverage the use of convergent evidence from multi-modal investigation tools in addressing the causal neural areas underlying distinct forms of impulsivity.
等待和停止是运动反应抑制的基本且不同的要素。传统上,人们通过选择序列反应时任务对人类的等待冲动性进行研究。主动停止是与等待冲动性相关的一种停止形式,而其相互作用的神经基础尚未明确界定。
我们进行了两项独立但具有层级关系的研究。在第一项研究中,我们对41名健康志愿者使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)、选择反应时任务和一项新颖的主动停止任务,以绘制参与等待冲动性和主动停止的重叠神经回路。在第二项研究中,我们旨在提供机制性和因果性证据,证明用连续θ爆发刺激(cTBS;一种抑制性重复经颅磁刺激方案)破坏该回路会影响等待冲动性。我们招募了51名健康的右利手志愿者,采用单盲、随机、受试者间设计,将他们随机分配到刺激组(n = 26)和假刺激组(n = 25),随后进行选择反应时任务。
在第一项研究中,我们发现:1. 一个由辅助运动前区和双侧前岛叶组成的共享神经网络,是等待冲动性和主动停止的基础;2. 在额外目标起始延迟的试验中,背内侧前额叶皮质和左下额叶回的活动与等待冲动性呈负相关。在第二项研究中,我们证明使用cTBS使左下额叶回失活显著增加了选择反应时任务中的等待冲动性。
我们的研究结果突出了任务设计在评估运动反应抑制中的相关性,以及左下额叶回完整性和相关神经回路在等待冲动性和主动停止中的作用。我们还利用多模态研究工具的汇聚证据来解决不同形式冲动性背后的因果神经区域问题。