Deutsch E C, Skolnik E M, Friedman M, Hill J H, Sharer K
Laryngoscope. 1985 May;95(5):561-5. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198505000-00008.
This study compares the neck tumor recurrence rate between patients treated with radical neck dissection and those treated with conservation neck dissection. A standard radical neck dissection modified by sparing at least the internal jugular vein or the spinal accessory nerve is defined as a conservation dissection. Six hundred ninety-one neck dissections performed on 631 patients in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery of the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago were reviewed retrospectively. All patients had been followed postoperatively for at least 24 months. Group I consisted of 422 radical neck dissections. Group II contained 269 conservation neck dissections. We found no statistically significant difference in the rate of neck recurrence between the group of patients who underwent radical neck dissection and the group who underwent conservation neck dissection.
本研究比较了接受根治性颈清扫术的患者与接受保留性颈清扫术的患者的颈部肿瘤复发率。将至少保留颈内静脉或副神经的改良标准根治性颈清扫术定义为保留性清扫术。对芝加哥伊利诺伊大学医学院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科631例患者进行的691例颈清扫术进行了回顾性研究。所有患者术后均随访至少24个月。第一组包括422例根治性颈清扫术。第二组包含269例保留性颈清扫术。我们发现,接受根治性颈清扫术的患者组与接受保留性颈清扫术的患者组之间,颈部复发率没有统计学上的显著差异。