Suppr超能文献

保留副神经的根治性颈清扫术后的颈部转移灶。

Cervical metastases following radical neck dissection that preserved the spinal accessory nerve.

作者信息

Carenfelt C, Eliasson K

出版信息

Head Neck Surg. 1980 Jan-Feb;2(3):181-4. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890020303.

Abstract

In contrast to the original neck dissection technique, the spinal accessory nerve is routinely sacrificed in the so-called classical neck dissection. The benefit of this routine has never been documented; on the contrary, facts have accumulated that indicate that the nerve should be preserved. The results in this article serve to emphasize this opinion. Of 80 patients who underwent radical neck dissection that preserved the spinal accessory nerve, the potential for cure was not jeopardized in a single case.

摘要

与最初的颈部清扫技术不同,在所谓的经典颈部清扫术中,副神经通常会被牺牲掉。这种常规做法的益处从未得到过证实;相反,越来越多的事实表明该神经应该被保留。本文的研究结果进一步强调了这一观点。在80例接受保留副神经的根治性颈部清扫术的患者中,没有一例患者的治愈可能性受到影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验