Parisudha Ryuu Damara, Ghinorawa Tanaya, Hardjo Indrawarman Soero
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Clin Transplant Res. 2025 Mar 31;39(1):36-45. doi: 10.4285/ctr.24.0041. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been the focus of several observational studies investigating their roles in acute allograft rejection (AR) and delayed graft function (DGF) among kidney transplant (KT) recipients. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of the NLR and PLR on the incidence of AR and DGF in KT recipients.
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE and Science Direct from their inception through October 2023. Random effects models were used. To investigate potential sources of heterogeneity, we performed subgroup and meta-regression analyses. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis ver. 3 software package was used.
Seven studies (247 KT recipients with AR or DGF and 475 controls) were analyzed. Our pooled analysis showed a significantly higher NLR in KT recipients with AR (weighted mean difference [WMD], 2.292; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.449-3.135; P<0.001) than in controls. The preoperative NLR was insignificantly higher in patients with DGF (WMD, 0.871; 95% CI, -0.103 to 1.846; P=0.08). The PLR was insignificantly higher in KT recipients with AR than in controls (WMD, 32.125; 95% CI, -19.978 to 84.228; P=0.227). The PLR was not significantly different between KT recipients with DGF and controls. Region, publication year, sample size, donor type, biopsy type, AR type and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score did not affect the outcomes of the meta-analysis. Meta-regression showed that publication year and donor type might be sources of heterogeneity.
This study revealed a significantly higher NLR in patients with AR. This suggests that NLR may be utilized as a noninvasive marker for AR in KT recipients.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)一直是多项观察性研究的重点,这些研究探讨了它们在肾移植(KT)受者急性移植物排斥反应(AR)和移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)中的作用。这项荟萃分析评估了NLR和PLR对KT受者AR和DGF发生率的影响。
我们检索了PubMed、MEDLINE和Science Direct自创建至2023年10月的文献。采用随机效应模型。为了探究潜在的异质性来源,我们进行了亚组分析和Meta回归分析。使用了Comprehensive Meta-Analysis ver. 3软件包。
分析了7项研究(247例发生AR或DGF的KT受者和475例对照)。我们的汇总分析显示,发生AR的KT受者的NLR显著高于对照组(加权平均差[WMD],2.292;95%置信区间[CI],1.449 - 3.135;P<0.001)。DGF患者术前的NLR略高,但差异无统计学意义(WMD,0.871;95% CI,-0.103至1.846;P = 0.08)。发生AR的KT受者的PLR略高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(WMD,32.125;95% CI,-19.978至84.228;P = 0.227)。发生DGF的KT受者与对照组之间的PLR无显著差异。地区、发表年份、样本量、供体类型、活检类型、AR类型和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评分均未影响荟萃分析的结果。Meta回归显示,发表年份和供体类型可能是异质性的来源。
本研究显示AR患者的NLR显著更高。这表明NLR可作为KT受者AR的无创标志物。