Pausch Antonia M, Filleböck Vivien, Elsner Clara, Rupp Niels J, Eberli Daniel, Hötker Andreas M
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2025 Jan 21;14:100635. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100635. eCollection 2025 Jun.
To compare the diagnostic performance and image quality of a deep-learning-assisted ultra-fast biparametric MRI (bpMRI) with the conventional multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
This prospective single-center study enrolled 123 biopsy-naïve patients undergoing conventional mpMRI and additionally ultra-fast bpMRI at 3 T between 06/2023-02/2024. Two radiologists (R1: 4 years and R2: 3 years of experience) independently assigned PI-RADS scores (PI-RADS v2.1) and assessed image quality (mPI-QUAL score) in two blinded study readouts. Weighted Cohen's Kappa (κ) was calculated to evaluate inter-reader agreement. Diagnostic performance was analyzed using clinical data and histopathological results from clinically indicated biopsies.
Inter-reader agreement was good for both mpMRI (κ = 0.83) and ultra-fast bpMRI (κ = 0.87). Both readers demonstrated high sensitivity (≥94 %/≥91 %, R1/R2) and NPV (≥96 %/≥95 %) for csPCa detection using both protocols. The more experienced reader mostly showed notably higher specificity (≥77 %/≥53 %), PPV (≥62 %/≥45 %), and diagnostic accuracy (≥82 %/≥65 %) compared to the less experienced reader. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of correctly identifying csPCa between both protocols (p > 0.05). The ultra-fast bpMRI protocol had significantly better image quality ratings (p < 0.001) and achieved a reduction in scan time of 80 % compared to conventional mpMRI.
Deep-learning-assisted ultra-fast bpMRI protocols offer a promising alternative to conventional mpMRI for diagnosing csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients with comparable inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance at superior image quality. However, reader experience remains essential for diagnostic performance.
比较深度学习辅助的超快双参数MRI(bpMRI)与传统多参数MRI(mpMRI)在诊断临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)方面的诊断性能和图像质量。
这项前瞻性单中心研究纳入了123例未经活检的患者,于2023年6月至2024年2月期间在3T条件下接受了传统mpMRI检查以及额外的超快bpMRI检查。两名放射科医生(R1:4年经验,R2:3年经验)在两项双盲研究读片中独立分配前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分(PI-RADS v2.1)并评估图像质量(mPI-QUAL评分)。计算加权科恩kappa(κ)值以评估阅片者间的一致性。使用临床数据和临床指征活检的组织病理学结果分析诊断性能。
阅片者间对于mpMRI(κ = 0.83)和超快bpMRI(κ = 0.87)的一致性均良好。两名阅片者使用两种方案检测csPCa时均表现出高灵敏度(≥94%/≥91%,R1/R2)和阴性预测值(≥96%/≥95%)。与经验较少的阅片者相比,经验更丰富的阅片者大多表现出显著更高的特异性(≥77%/≥53%)、阳性预测值(≥62%/≥45%)和诊断准确性(≥82%/≥65%)。两种方案在正确识别csPCa的诊断性能上无显著差异(p > 0.05)。超快bpMRI方案的图像质量评分显著更高(p < 0.001),与传统mpMRI相比扫描时间减少了80%。
对于未经活检的患者,深度学习辅助的超快bpMRI方案在阅片者间一致性和诊断性能相当且图像质量更优的情况下,为诊断csPCa提供了一种有前景的替代传统mpMRI 的方法。然而,阅片者经验对于诊断性能仍然至关重要。