Barbosa Carolyne Souza de Moura, Silva Ana Cecília Silvestre da, Melo Géssyca Cavalcante de, França Alba Maria Bomfim de
Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Scholarship holder at the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Alagoas (FAPEAL), Brazil.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2025 Jan 31;33:e4437. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6910.4437. eCollection 2025.
to analyze the reproductive autonomy of women during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering sociodemographic, clinical, and reproductive factors.
a quantitative study with a cross-sectional design, conducted with 314 women aged 18 to 49 years old. Data were collected through an online questionnaire containing sociodemographic, clinical, and reproductive data, as well as the Reproductive Autonomy Scale. The Mann-Whitney and Student's t tests were used to compare variables.
significant differences were found between the average scores of "decision-making" and marital status (p = <0.001); and "absence of coercion" and "communication" with age group (p = 0.03 e <0.001), residence (p = <0.001 and <0.01), schooling level (p = 0.02 e 0.02), pregnancy (p = <0.001 e 0.04) and contraception (p = 0.02 e <0.001).
not having a sexual partner positively influenced autonomy in reproductive decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women of younger age, living in the capital, with higher education levels, who had never been pregnant, and who used contraceptives during the pandemic showed greater autonomy in the absence of coercion and communication. It was possible to identify the groups that require greater attention and interventions to support their sexual health and reproductive choices.
(1) A high reproductive autonomy score was observed even during the pandemic. (2) Not having a stable partner positively influenced reproductive decision-making. (3) Women living in the capital, of younger age, and with lower education levels experienced less coercion. (4) Being nulligravida and using contraception were associated with less coercion and better communication. (5) The use of an online tool during the pandemic expanded the program's reach to women.
考虑社会人口学、临床和生殖因素,分析新冠疫情期间女性的生殖自主权。
采用横断面设计的定量研究,对314名年龄在18至49岁的女性进行。通过一份包含社会人口学、临床和生殖数据以及生殖自主量表的在线问卷收集数据。使用曼-惠特尼检验和学生t检验来比较变量。
在“决策”的平均得分与婚姻状况之间(p = <0.001);以及“无胁迫”和“沟通”与年龄组(p = 0.03和<0.001)、居住地(p = <0.001和<0.01)、教育水平(p = 0.02和0.02)、妊娠情况(p = <0.001和0.04)和避孕措施(p = 0.02和<0.001)之间发现了显著差异。
在新冠疫情期间,没有性伴侣对生殖决策自主权有积极影响。年龄较小、居住在首都、教育水平较高、从未怀孕且在疫情期间使用避孕措施的女性在无胁迫和沟通方面表现出更大的自主权。有可能识别出需要更多关注和干预以支持其性健康和生殖选择的群体。
(1)即使在疫情期间也观察到较高的生殖自主得分。(2)没有稳定伴侣对生殖决策有积极影响。(3)居住在首都、年龄较小且教育水平较低的女性受到的胁迫较少。(4)未孕和使用避孕措施与较少的胁迫和更好的沟通相关。(5)疫情期间使用在线工具扩大了该项目对女性的覆盖范围。