Dombach Jamie L, Smith Nancy C, Kottiri Teresa, Schiller Alicia M, Kamau Edwin
Department of Clinical Investigations, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Department of Pathology and Area Laboratory Services, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Mar 4;13(3):e0186024. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01860-24. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
Uncomplicated bacteremic urinary tract infections (bUTIs) are common, often caused by , , and , with most encounters treated empirically. As rates of antimicrobial resistance increase, available antibiotic treatment options are dwindling. Novel antibiotics approved for treating bUTIs are limited, leading to a resurgence of interest in older antibiotics, including fosfomycin. Here, clinical urine samples from patients including military personnel, retirees, and their dependents diagnosed with bUTIs from a military hospital located in Bethesda, Maryland, were tested for susceptibility to fosfomycin and comparator antibiotics (levofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMS]). A total of 1,353 nonduplicate bacterial isolates were tested, including 605 non-ESBL and 285 ESBL , and 84 non-ESBL and 52 ESBL . Fosfomycin susceptibility rates were similar for non-ESBL and ESBL (95.9% vs 96.1%) and (38.1% vs 36.5%). Fosfomycin demonstrated high activity against other Enterobacterales and gram-positive organisms including and . Interestingly, most fosfomycin non-susceptible isolates were susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment options, and most isolates that were non-susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment option were susceptible to fosfomycin. ESBL isolates were the least susceptible to current first-line treatment options. Fosfomycin Etest demonstrated high sensitivity compared to agar dilution, making it a viable AST testing method especially in resource-limited areas. Overall, we demonstrated fosfomycin has high activity against common etiologies that cause bUTIs. Further clinical efficacy studies investigating the use of fosfomycin in treating non-. bUTI pathogens, as single or combination therapy, are warranted.
Uncomplicated bUTIs are often caused by , , and . Fosfomycin is one of the recommended firstline antibiotics for the treatment of symptomatic, uncomplicated bUTIs. Fosfomycin susceptibility testing is complicated by the fact that although both CLSI and EUCAST recognize agar dilution (AD) as the reference method albeit being labor-intensive, breakpoints are different, and Etest is only approved by EUCAST. We investigated the susceptibility of bUTI clinical isolates to fosfomycin using AD and compared performance in a subset of isolates to Etest. Fosfomycin susceptibility profiles of bacterial isolates were compared to other firstline antibiotics. We found isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin at similar or higher rates compared to other firstline antibiotics. Importantly, fosfomycin was effective against isolates producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and those that were resistant to other firstline treatments. Furthermore, our data showed Etest was a viable option for susceptibility testing with 94% agreement to the AD.
非复杂性菌血症性尿路感染(bUTIs)很常见,通常由大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和奇异变形杆菌引起,大多数病例采用经验性治疗。随着抗菌药物耐药率的上升,可用的抗生素治疗选择越来越少。获批用于治疗bUTIs的新型抗生素有限,这导致人们对包括磷霉素在内的老一代抗生素重新产生兴趣。在此,对来自马里兰州贝塞斯达一家军事医院诊断为bUTIs的患者(包括军人、退休人员及其家属)的临床尿液样本进行了磷霉素及对照抗生素(左氧氟沙星、呋喃妥因和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑[TMS])的药敏试验。共检测了1353株非重复细菌分离株,包括605株非超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和285株ESBL大肠埃希菌,以及84株非ESBL肺炎克雷伯菌和52株ESBL肺炎克雷伯菌。非ESBL和ESBL大肠埃希菌的磷霉素药敏率相似(95.9%对96.1%),非ESBL和ESBL肺炎克雷伯菌的药敏率也相似(38.1%对36.5%)。磷霉素对其他肠杆菌科细菌和革兰氏阳性菌(包括屎肠球菌和粪肠球菌)表现出高活性。有趣的是,大多数对磷霉素不敏感的分离株对其他一线bUTI治疗选择敏感,而大多数对其他一线bUTI治疗选择不敏感的分离株对磷霉素敏感。ESBL肺炎克雷伯菌分离株对当前一线治疗选择最不敏感。与琼脂稀释法相比,磷霉素Etest显示出高灵敏度,使其成为一种可行的药敏试验方法,尤其是在资源有限的地区。总体而言,我们证明磷霉素对引起bUTIs的常见病原体具有高活性。有必要进一步开展临床疗效研究,以调查磷霉素作为单药或联合疗法治疗非……bUTI病原体的情况。
非复杂性bUTIs通常由大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和奇异变形杆菌引起。磷霉素是治疗有症状的非复杂性bUTIs的推荐一线抗生素之一。磷霉素药敏试验较为复杂,因为尽管临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)和欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)都认可琼脂稀释法(AD)为参考方法,尽管该方法 labor-intensive,但断点不同,且Etest仅被EUCAST批准。我们使用AD研究了bUTI临床分离株对磷霉素的敏感性,并在一部分分离株中与Etest比较了性能。将细菌分离株的磷霉素药敏谱与其他一线抗生素进行了比较。我们发现,与其他一线抗生素相比,分离株对磷霉素的敏感率相似或更高。重要的是,磷霉素对产生超广谱β-内酰胺酶的分离株以及对其他一线治疗耐药的分离株有效。此外,我们的数据表明Etest是一种可行的药敏试验选择,与AD的一致性为94%。