Lowin Julia, Sewell Bernadette, Prettyjohns Matthew, Farr Angela, Foley Kieran G
Swansea Centre for Health Economics (SCHE), Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
Health Technology Wales, Cardiff CF10 4PL, United Kingdom.
Br J Radiol. 2025 May 1;98(1169):693-700. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqaf024.
Gallbladder polyps (GBPs) are commonly detected with trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAUS). Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is associated with GBPs but the risk of malignancy is low. International guidelines recommend ultrasound surveillance (USS) in selected cases of GBPs <10 mm, with cholecystectomy advised if the polyp size increases. USS (including potential cholecystectomies) is resource intense. We evaluated the costs and potential cost-effectiveness of USS in a theoretical UK patient cohort with GBPs.
A health economic model mapped expected management pathways over 2 years for 1000 GBP patients with and without USS, stratified by the initial size of GBP (<6 mm and 6-9 mm). We estimated USS resource and costs under alternate referral thresholds for cholecystectomy. Clinical data were extracted from a large-scale cohort study. TAUS and cholecystectomy costs were based on NHS tariffs. GBC costs were estimated from the literature. Outcomes included USS costs, expected numbers of GBC, and incremental cost for each case of GBC avoided.
The 2-year additional cohort costs of USS (n = number of cholecystectomies) were estimated between £213 441 (n = 50) and £750 045 (n = 253) in GBPs <6 mm and between £420 275 (n = 165) and £531 297 (n = 207) in GBPs 6-9 mm, balanced against avoidance of 1.3 (<6 mm) and 8.7 (6-9 mm) cases of GBC. Model findings were robust to plausible changes in inputs.
Using published data, we demonstrated that, in patients with GBPs <10 mm, the costs of USS to avoid GBC outweigh potential GBC cost offsets and would result in high rates of cholecystectomy. Additional evidence is needed to establish the formal cost-effectiveness of GBP USS in the UK.
• We developed a health economic model, based on published data, to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of guideline-recommended ultrasound surveillance (USS) in patients with gallbladder polyps measuring less than 10 mm in the UK.• The analysis provides a transparent platform to explore potential numbers of trans-abdominal ultrasound studies and cholecystectomies that might be expected if USS protocols are adhered to and discovers important gaps in current evidence that could be filled by additional targeted research.
胆囊息肉(GBP)通常通过经腹超声(TAUS)检测发现。胆囊癌(GBC)与GBP相关,但恶性风险较低。国际指南建议对部分直径小于10 mm的GBP病例进行超声监测(USS),若息肉大小增加则建议行胆囊切除术。USS(包括可能的胆囊切除术)资源消耗大。我们在一个理论上的英国GBP患者队列中评估了USS的成本及潜在成本效益。
一个健康经济模型描绘了1000例有或无USS的GBP患者在2年内的预期管理路径,并根据GBP的初始大小(<6 mm和6 - 9 mm)进行分层。我们估计了在不同胆囊切除转诊阈值下USS的资源和成本。临床数据取自一项大规模队列研究。TAUS和胆囊切除术成本基于英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)收费标准。GBC成本根据文献估计。结果包括USS成本、预期GBC病例数以及避免每例GBC的增量成本。
在<6 mm的GBP中,USS的2年额外队列成本估计在213441英镑(n = 胆囊切除例数 = 50)至750045英镑(n = 253)之间;在6 - 9 mm的GBP中,成本估计在420275英镑(n = 165)至531297英镑(n = 207)之间,与之相权衡的是可避免1.3例(<6 mm)和8.7例(6 - 9 mm)GBC。模型结果对输入参数的合理变化具有稳健性。
利用已发表的数据,我们证明,在直径小于10 mm的GBP患者中,为避免GBC而进行USS的成本超过了潜在的GBC成本抵消,且会导致高胆囊切除率。在英国,需要更多证据来确定GBP的USS的正式成本效益。
• 我们基于已发表的数据开发了一个健康经济模型,以评估英国指南推荐的对直径小于10 mm的胆囊息肉患者进行超声监测(USS)的成本效益。
• 该分析提供了一个透明的平台,用于探讨如果遵循USS方案可能预期的经腹超声检查和胆囊切除的潜在数量,并发现当前证据中可通过额外的针对性研究填补的重要空白。