Yang Mingming, Kondo Toru, Talebi Atefeh, Jhund Pardeep S, Docherty Kieran F, Claggett Brian L, Vaduganathan Muthiah, Bachus Erasmus, Hernandez Adrian F, Lam Carolyn S P, Martinez Felipe A, de Boer Rudolf A, Kosiborod Mikhail N, Desai Akshay S, Køber Lars, Ponikowski Piotr, Sabatine Marc S, Solomon Scott D, McMurray John J V
Department of Cardiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China; British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
JACC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;13(2):277-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.10.020.
The value of generic quality of life (QoL) instruments in heart failure (HF) is uncertain.
In this study, the authors sought to quantify individual dimension scores and the EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) Level Sum Score (LSS) in patients with HF with reduced, mildly reduced, or preserved ejection fraction, the association between those scores and outcomes, and the impact of treatment with dapagliflozin on the scores.
Analyses were conducted using patient-level data from DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association between EQ-5D scores (each dimension and LSS) and clinical outcomes. Sankey diagrams were used to illustrate changes in individual patient EQ-5D dimensions from baseline to 8 months' follow-up.
Of the 11,007 patients randomized in DAPA-HF and DELIVER, 10,135 (92.1%) completed the instrument at baseline. Scores varied markedly by question with 37%, 30%, and 33% of patients reporting no, slight, or moderate or greater problem, respectively for mobility; 67%, 20%, and 13% for self-care; 40%, 33%, and 27% for usual activities; 45%, 32%, and 23% for pain/discomfort; and 57%, 27%, and 16% for anxiety/depression. Patients with higher (worse) EQ-5D-LSS were more frequently female, had more comorbidities, and had worse HF status. Compared with patients free from any problem across all dimensions (ie, an EQ-5D-LSS of 5), the HRs for the composite outcome of time to first cardiovascular death or worsening HF were 1.27 (95% CI: 1.10-1.47), 1.70 (95% CI: 1.46-1.98), and 2.31 (95% CI: 1.88-2.85) in patients with EQ-5D-LSS of 6-10, 11-15, and 16-25 points, respectively. Dapagliflozin led to greater improvement and less worsening in mobility (OR: 1.13 [95% CI: 1.04-1.23]; P = 0.004), self-care (OR: 1.13 [95% CI: 1.02-1.24]; P = 0.016), usual activities (OR: 1.11 [95% CI: 1.02-1.21]; P = 0.015), and anxiety/depression (OR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.01-1.21]; P = 0.034) after 8 months. The number needed to treat for 1 patient to report improvement in EQ-5D-LSS was 31 (95% CI: 20-72).
The EQ-5D revealed problems not often associated (eg, pain) with HF or commonly quantified in HF (eg, anxiety/depression). Dapagliflozin improved multiple QoL dimensions, and possibly anxiety/depression. (Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dapagliflozin on the Incidence of Worsening Heart Failure or Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure [DAPA-HF]; NCT03036124; Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure [DELIVER]; NCT03619213).
通用生活质量(QoL)工具在心力衰竭(HF)中的价值尚不确定。
在本研究中,作者试图量化射血分数降低、轻度降低或保留的HF患者的个体维度得分和欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D)水平总和得分(LSS),这些得分与结局之间的关联,以及达格列净治疗对这些得分的影响。
使用来自DAPA-HF和DELIVER试验的患者水平数据进行分析。采用Cox比例风险回归模型评估EQ-5D得分(各维度和LSS)与临床结局之间的关联。使用桑基图说明个体患者EQ-5D维度从基线到8个月随访的变化。
在DAPA-HF和DELIVER试验中随机分组的11,007例患者中,10,135例(92.1%)在基线时完成了该量表。各问题的得分差异显著,分别有37%、30%和33%的患者报告在活动能力方面无问题、有轻微问题或有中度或更严重问题;自我护理方面分别为67%、20%和13%;日常活动方面分别为40%、33%和27%;疼痛/不适方面分别为45%、32%和23%;焦虑/抑郁方面分别为57%、27%和16%。EQ-5D-LSS较高(较差)的患者女性更常见,合并症更多,HF状态更差。与所有维度均无任何问题(即EQ-5D-LSS为5)的患者相比,EQ-5D-LSS为6-10分、11-15分和16-25分的患者首次发生心血管死亡或HF恶化复合结局的HR分别为1.27(95%CI:1.10-1.47)、1.70(95%CI:1.46-1.98)和2.31(95%CI:1.88-2.85)。8个月后,达格列净使活动能力(OR:1.13[95%CI:1.04-1.23];P=0.004)、自我护理(OR:1.13[95%CI:1.02-1.24];P=0.016)、日常活动(OR:1.11[95%CI:1.02-1.21];P=0.015)和焦虑/抑郁(OR:1.10[95%CI:1.01-1.21];P=0.034)方面有更大改善且恶化更少。使1例患者报告EQ-5D-LSS改善所需治疗人数为31(95%CI:20-72)。
EQ-5D揭示了一些通常与HF无关(如疼痛)或在HF中未被普遍量化(如焦虑/抑郁)的问题。达格列净改善了多个QoL维度,可能还改善了焦虑/抑郁。(评估达格列净对慢性心力衰竭患者HF恶化或心血管死亡发生率影响的研究[DAPA-HF];NCT03036124;评估达格列净改善射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者生活质量的研究[DELIVER];NCT03619213)