Garelius Hege Kristin Gravdahl, Bagguley Timothy, Taylor Adele, Fenaux Pierre, Bowen David, Symeonidis Argiris, Mittelmann Moshe, Stauder Reinhard, Čermák Jaroslav, Sanz Guillermo, Langemeijer Saskia, Malcovati Luca, Germing Ulrich, Sanhes Laurence, d'Aveni Maud, Culligan Dominic, Kotsianidis Ioannis, Koinig Karin A, van Marrewijk Corine, Crouch Simon, deWitte Theo, Smith Alexandra, Hellström-Lindberg Eva
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Epidemiology & Cancer Statistics Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Lancet Haematol. 2025 Feb;12(2):e128-e137. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00350-8.
In our previous study on erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes from the European MDS (EUMDS) Registry, we showed that patients treated with ESAs had longer survival compared with patients who receive red blood cell transfusion (RBCT). In this study, with a longer follow up time and more patients included, we aimed to assess long-term effects on survival and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of exposure to ESAs with or without RBCT in patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
The EUMDS Registry is a non-interventional, longitudinal, real-world registry prospectively enrolling newly diagnosed patients older than 18 years with lower risk (International Prognostic Scoring System low or intermediate-1) myelodysplastic syndromes from 16 European countries and Israel. The analysis was restricted to patients with haemoglobin concentrations less than 100 g/L enrolled between Jan 1, 2008, and July 1, 2019, with last censoring of data on Dec 31, 2021. Patient management was recorded every 6 months, including treatment, transfusions, and HRQoL. ESA treatment followed local guidelines. The patients were separated into four groups at each study visit: no ESA or RBCT, ESA only, ESA plus RBCT, and RBCT only. The data were analysed longitudinally over time according to ESA and RBCT status during each 6-month interval, using propensity score matching. The main outcomes were median overall survival and leukaemia-free survival, and HRQoL. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00600860, as is ongoing.
2448 patients (the ESA-unexposed group [n=1265] and ESA-exposed group [n=1183]) were diagnosed before July 1, 2019; 1520 (62·1%) were male and 928 (37·9%) were female. Median follow-up time was 3·9 years (IQR 1·6-6·5). After applying eligibility criteria and propensity matching, there were 426 patients in the ESA-unexposed group and 744 patients in the ESA-exposed group. Median overall survival in the ESA exposed group was 44·9 months (95% CI 40·2-50·5) compared with 34·8 months (28·6-39·2) in the ESA unexposed group; the absolute difference was 10·1 months (95% CI 2·2-18·0; hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·59-0·83]; p<0·0001). Patients without RBCT in the presence or absence of ESA exposure maintained significantly better HRQoL than those with RBCT, irrespective of ESA exposure (linear mixed effect model of EQ-5d-3L index score, RBCT coefficient -0·04 [95% CI -0·06 to 0·03], p<0·0001; linear mixed effect model of VAS, -4·57 [-6·02 to -3·13], p<0·0001).
ESA treatment in patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes significantly improves overall survival when started before or early after the onset of regular transfusion therapy. Avoiding RBCT is associated with significantly better HRQoL.
H2020 European Research Council, Novartis Pharmacy B V Oncology Europe, Amgen, BMS/Celgene International, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, and Gilead Sciences.
在我们之前基于欧洲骨髓增生异常综合征(EUMDS)注册研究中对低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者使用促红细胞生成素(ESA)治疗的研究里,我们发现接受ESA治疗的患者比接受红细胞输血(RBCT)的患者生存期更长。在本研究中,随着随访时间延长和纳入患者增多,我们旨在评估低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者接受或未接受RBCT时使用ESA对生存及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的长期影响。
EUMDS注册研究是一项非干预性、纵向、真实世界的注册研究,前瞻性纳入来自16个欧洲国家和以色列的18岁以上新诊断的低危(国际预后评分系统低危或中危-1)骨髓增生异常综合征患者。分析限于2008年1月1日至2019年7月1日期间血红蛋白浓度低于100g/L且于2021年12月31日进行末次数据审查的患者。每6个月记录患者管理情况,包括治疗、输血和HRQoL。ESA治疗遵循当地指南。每次研究访视时将患者分为四组:未使用ESA或RBCT、仅使用ESA、ESA加RBCT、仅使用RBCT。根据每6个月间隔期间的ESA和RBCT状态,使用倾向评分匹配对数据进行纵向分析。主要结局为总生存中位数、无白血病生存以及HRQoL。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT00600860,研究正在进行中。
2448例患者(未暴露于ESA组[n = 1265]和暴露于ESA组[n = 1183])于2019年7月1日前确诊;1520例(62.1%)为男性,928例(37.9%)为女性。中位随访时间为3.9年(IQR 1.6 - 6.5)。应用纳入标准和倾向匹配后,未暴露于ESA组有426例患者,暴露于ESA组有744例患者。暴露于ESA组的总生存中位数为44.9个月(95%CI 40.2 - 50.5),而未暴露于ESA组为34.8个月(28.6 - 39.2);绝对差值为10.1个月(95%CI 2.2 - 18.0;风险比[HR] 0.70 [95%CI 0.59 - 0.83];p < 0.0001)。无论是否暴露于ESA,未接受RBCT的患者HRQoL均显著优于接受RBCT者(EQ - 5d - 3L指数评分的线性混合效应模型,RBCT系数 - 0.04 [95%CI - 0.06至 - 0.03],p < 0.0001;VAS的线性混合效应模型, - 4.57 [- 6.02至 - 3.13],p < 0.0001)。
低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者在开始定期输血治疗之前或早期开始使用ESA治疗可显著改善总生存。避免RBCT与显著更好的HRQoL相关。
H2020欧洲研究理事会、诺华制药BV欧洲肿瘤学、安进公司、百时美施贵宝/新基国际、杨森制药、武田制药国际和吉利德科学公司。