一项评估低危 MDS 贫血患者使用促红细胞生成素-α的疗效和安全性的 3 期随机、安慰剂对照研究。

A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of epoetin-α in anemic patients with low-risk MDS.

机构信息

Hôpital St. Louis, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.

Hematology AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2018 Dec;32(12):2648-2658. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0118-9. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

Abstract

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are first choice for treating anemia in low-risk MDS. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and safety of epoetin-α in IPSS low- or intermediate-1 risk (i.e., low-risk) MDS patients with Hb ≤ 10.0 g/dL, with no or moderate RBC transfusion dependence (≤4 RBC units/8 weeks). Patients were randomized, 2:1, to receive epoetin-α 450 IU/kg/week or placebo for 24 weeks, followed by treatment extension in responders. The primary endpoint was erythroid response (ER) through Week 24. Dose adjustments were driven by weekly Hb-levels and included increases, and dose reductions/discontinuation if Hb > 12 g/dL. An independent Response Review Committee (RRC) blindly reviewed all responses, applying IWG-2006 criteria but also considering dose adjustments, drug interruptions and longer periods of observation.A total of 130 patients were randomized (85 to epoetin-α and 45 to placebo). The ER by IWG-2006 criteria was 31.8% for epoetin-α vs 4.4% for placebo (p < 0.001); after RRC review, the ER was 45.9 vs 4.4% (p < 0.001), respectively. Epoetin-α reduced RBC transfusions and increased the time-to-first-transfusion compared with placebo.Thus, epoetin-α significantly improved anemia outcomes in low-risk MDS. IWG-2006 criteria for ER may require amendments to better apply to clinical studies.

摘要

促红细胞生成素刺激剂是治疗低危 MDS 贫血的首选药物。这项双盲、安慰剂对照研究评估了低危 MDS(即 IPSS 低危或中危 1 级)患者中,Hb≤10.0g/dL、无或中 RBC 输血依赖(≤4 个 RBC 单位/8 周)时,使用促红素-α的疗效和安全性。患者随机分为 2:1 接受促红素-α 450IU/kg/周或安慰剂治疗 24 周,然后对有反应者进行治疗延长。主要终点是第 24 周时的红细胞反应(ER)。剂量调整由每周 Hb 水平驱动,包括增加剂量和减少剂量/停药,如果 Hb>12g/dL。独立的反应审查委员会(RRC)对所有反应进行盲法评估,应用 IWG-2006 标准,但也考虑剂量调整、药物中断和更长的观察期。共有 130 名患者被随机分组(85 名接受促红素-α治疗,45 名接受安慰剂治疗)。根据 IWG-2006 标准,促红素-α的 ER 为 31.8%,安慰剂为 4.4%(p<0.001);在 RRC 审查后,ER 分别为 45.9%和 4.4%(p<0.001)。与安慰剂相比,促红素-α减少了 RBC 输血,并增加了首次输血时间。因此,促红素-α显著改善了低危 MDS 的贫血结局。ER 的 IWG-2006 标准可能需要修订,以更好地适用于临床研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e94/6286328/fcc49d11fcf7/41375_2018_118_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索