• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国数字疗法试验的优先级、质量和包容性评估。

Assessment of priorities, quality, and inclusivity of digital therapeutics trials in China.

作者信息

Wang Ziming, Xia Xinxin, Lu Weijia, Ye Yuguo, Xu Jin

机构信息

China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 38, China.

Hainan Institute of Health Development Studies, Xueyuan Road, 3, Haikou, China.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 4;8(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01477-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01477-6
PMID:39910261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799303/
Abstract

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software-driven solutions for prevention, treatment, and management of medical conditions. Despite a pro-DTx momentum in China, global DTx trial assessments overlooked the country. We identified 756 DTx trials in China and analyzed their characteristics and quality parameters. Over 70% were funded by governments, hospitals, and universities, with tertiary hospitals in eastern China leading most trials. 44.8% used automated DTx, with 39.2% DTx-guided. Most trials focused on management (52.5%) and treatment (38.1%), with few on prevention (9.4%). Mental, behavioral, or neurodevelopmental disorders represented the leading condition category of focus. Recent declines in median sample size, median duration, and mean number of sites were noted. Only 18% of trials were at low overall risk of bias. While recognizing the rapid development of DTx trials in China, we call for better trial design and methodological rigor, prioritization of preventive and primary care, wider condition category scope, and higher inclusivity.

摘要

数字疗法(DTx)是用于医疗状况预防、治疗和管理的软件驱动解决方案。尽管中国对数字疗法有推动势头,但全球数字疗法试验评估忽略了该国。我们在中国识别出756项数字疗法试验,并分析了它们的特征和质量参数。超过70%由政府、医院和大学资助,中国东部的三级医院主导了大多数试验。44.8%使用自动化数字疗法,39.2%为数字疗法指导。大多数试验聚焦于管理(52.5%)和治疗(38.1%),很少涉及预防(9.4%)。精神、行为或神经发育障碍是主要的关注疾病类别。注意到近期中位样本量、中位持续时间和平均试验地点数量有所下降。只有18%的试验总体偏倚风险较低。在认识到中国数字疗法试验快速发展的同时,我们呼吁进行更好的试验设计和方法严谨性,优先考虑预防和初级保健,扩大疾病类别范围,提高包容性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b0/11799303/90d537d0864f/41746_2025_1477_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b0/11799303/858ca64803e6/41746_2025_1477_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b0/11799303/56498900156d/41746_2025_1477_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b0/11799303/90d537d0864f/41746_2025_1477_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b0/11799303/858ca64803e6/41746_2025_1477_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b0/11799303/56498900156d/41746_2025_1477_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b0/11799303/90d537d0864f/41746_2025_1477_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of priorities, quality, and inclusivity of digital therapeutics trials in China.中国数字疗法试验的优先级、质量和包容性评估。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 4;8(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01477-6.
2
Challenges With the Use of Digital Sham: Systematic Review and Recommendations.使用数字假手的挑战:系统评价与建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 24;25:e44764. doi: 10.2196/44764.
3
Appropriate controls for digital therapeutic clinical trials: A narrative review of control conditions in clinical trials of digital therapeutics (DTx) deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.数字疗法临床试验的适当对照:对采用心理社会、认知或行为内容的数字疗法(DTx)临床试验中的对照条件的叙述性综述。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 18;4:823977. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.823977. eCollection 2022.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
A comprehensive survey of the clinical trial Landscape on digital therapeutics.关于数字疗法临床试验现状的全面调查。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 10;10(16):e36115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36115. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
6
Tracing Digital Therapeutics Research Across Medical Specialties: Evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov.追踪跨医学专业的数字治疗研究:来自 ClinicalTrials.gov 的证据。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jul;116(1):177-185. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3260. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
7
Examining Diversity in Digital Therapeutics Clinical Trials: Descriptive Analysis.研究数字治疗临床试验中的多样性:描述性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 2;25:e37447. doi: 10.2196/37447.
8
Economic Evaluation Associated With Clinical-Grade Mobile App-Based Digital Therapeutic Interventions: Systematic Review.基于临床级移动应用的数字治疗干预措施的经济评估:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 1;25:e47094. doi: 10.2196/47094.
9
AMCP Partnership Forum: Digital Therapeutics-What Are They and Where Do They Fit in Pharmacy and Medical Benefits?AMCP 合作论坛:数字疗法——它们是什么,以及它们在药学和医疗福利中的定位是什么?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):674-681. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19418. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
10
Digital Therapeutics in Hearing Healthcare: Evidence-Based Review.听力保健中的数字疗法:基于证据的综述。
J Audiol Otol. 2024 Jul;28(3):159-166. doi: 10.7874/jao.2023.00780. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
A comprehensive survey of the clinical trial Landscape on digital therapeutics.关于数字疗法临床试验现状的全面调查。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 10;10(16):e36115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36115. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
2
Navigating the future of health care with AI-driven digital therapeutics.利用人工智能驱动的数字疗法应对未来医疗保健的挑战。
Drug Discov Today. 2024 Sep;29(9):104110. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104110. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
3
Prescription Digital Therapeutics: Assertions.处方数字疗法:主张。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jun;43(6):897. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00152.
4
Tracing Digital Therapeutics Research Across Medical Specialties: Evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov.追踪跨医学专业的数字治疗研究:来自 ClinicalTrials.gov 的证据。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jul;116(1):177-185. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3260. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
5
Estimating the economic burden of stroke in China: a cost-of-illness study.估算中国卒中的经济负担:疾病成本研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 13;14(3):e080634. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080634.
6
[Chinese expert consensus on digital therapeutics for insomnia (2024 edition)].《中国失眠症数字疗法专家共识(2024年版)》
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 5;104(9):650-661. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230904-00386.
7
Characterisation of digital therapeutic clinical trials: a systematic review with natural language processing.数字治疗临床试验的特征:基于自然语言处理的系统评价。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Mar;6(3):e222-e229. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00244-3.
8
Health care costs of cardiovascular disease in China: a machine learning-based cross-sectional study.中国心血管疾病的医疗保健费用:基于机器学习的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 6;11:1301276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1301276. eCollection 2023.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of digital therapeutics for home-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation.导管消融术后房颤患者家庭心脏康复数字疗法的成本效益分析
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 7;9:20552076231211548. doi: 10.1177/20552076231211548. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Studies Of Prescription Digital Therapeutics Often Lack Rigor And Inclusivity.研究处方数字疗法往往缺乏严谨性和包容性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Nov;42(11):1559-1567. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00384.