Fast and accurate peak skin dose estimation method for interventional fluoroscopy patients.

BACKGROUND

In fluoroscopy, particularly fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGIs), accurate estimation of peak skin dose (PSD) is crucial for identifying potential radiation-induced skin injuries. Most current methodologies for PSD calculation methods rely on analytical methods, which may introduce uncertainty due to their limited consideration of the complexities of x-ray beam conditions, patient geometry, and positioning. Methods based on full Monte Carlo (MC) simulations can enhance accuracy, but their practical application is limited due to the intensive requirement of computational resources and time.

PURPOSE

We aimed to develop a novel method that combines MC simulation with a noise reduction technique to calculate PSD, as well as skin dose distributions, more efficiently and accurately. The goal was to overcome the limitations of current methods, providing a more practical solution for clinical and academic use.

METHODS

Our method to calculate the PSD and skin dose distributions consists of two steps of rough MC simulation and iterative noise reduction. The performance of the methodology was demonstrated for six fluoroscopy scenarios, with results compared against those from full MC simulation with high particle history, which is considered a gold standard for radiation dosimetry relative to conventional analytical methods.

RESULTS

Our method was demonstrated for various fluoroscopy scenarios, and the result showed that the iterative noise reduction procedure successfully estimates PSD and skin dose distribution for rough MC simulations with a maximum dose statistical error of up to 20%. For successful dose estimations, PSD discrepancies from the values obtained by full MC simulation were within 3%, and voxel-wise dose differences in skin dose distributions were less than 10% of the average skin dose. The computation time of our method was on the order of a few seconds on a personal computer, which is estimated to be at least 10 times faster than full MC simulation when using the same computing resources.

CONCLUSION

Our method rapidly and accurately calculates PSD and skin dose distribution, making it a useful tool for research and clinical applications. The planned integration of our method into the National Cancer Institute Dosimetry System for Radiography and Fluoroscopy (NCIRF) will enhance accessibility. Additionally, future upgrades of NCIRF will include a comprehensive phantom library and pregnant phantoms that will enable our method to account for patient-specific body shapes, further improving the accuracy and personalization in dose assessments.