Department of Medical Imaging, Nimes University Hospital, Univ Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nimes, EA 2415, France.
Phys Med. 2021 Jan;81:170-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
For long, complex procedures in interventional radiology (IR) or in interventional cardiology (IC), the skin dose can be high and induce skin injuries. To improve patient follow-up, it is essential to measure and locate the peak skin dose (PSD). PSD can be measured using dosimeters or computed by skin dose calculation software solutions. Recently, a study was published (e.g. Malchair F et al Phys Med 2020; 80:75-83) listing all the software solutions developed and available and compared them in operation as regards accuracy of the calculated PSD and generated dose map. Similarities and differences exist between these different software packages, which are discussed here. The accuracy of PSD calculated on phantom studies with these software solutions are within ± 25% and poorer in patient studies. Improvements are therefore required for manufacturers of both software and IR systems. The medical physicists also have an important role to play in setting up and monitoring the dose in these software solutions to ensure the accuracy of the calculated PSD.
长期以来,介入放射学(IR)或介入心脏病学(IC)中的复杂程序会导致皮肤剂量很高,并引发皮肤损伤。为了改善患者的随访,测量和定位峰值皮肤剂量(PSD)至关重要。PSD 可以使用剂量计进行测量,也可以通过皮肤剂量计算软件解决方案进行计算。最近,发表了一项研究(例如,Malchair F 等人,《物理医学》,2020 年;80:75-83),列出了所有已开发和可用的软件解决方案,并对它们在操作中的准确性和生成的剂量图进行了比较。这些不同的软件包之间存在相似之处和差异,这里进行了讨论。这些软件解决方案在体模研究中计算出的 PSD 准确性在±25% 以内,在患者研究中较差。因此,软件和 IR 系统的制造商都需要改进。医学物理学家在设置和监测这些软件解决方案中的剂量方面也发挥着重要作用,以确保计算出的 PSD 的准确性。