Borah Gourav J, Pande Gaurav, Malakar Sayan, Kumar S Rakesh, Yadav Rajanikant R, Mohindra Samir
Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Jan 6;17(1):e76988. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76988. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Background Overwhelming splanchnic and systemic vasodilatation and low mean arterial pressure (MAP) pose significant challenges in mobilizing ascites in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and survival benefits of oral vasoconstrictor and weekly albumin therapy in patients with diuretic intractable and recurrent ascites in cirrhosis. Materials and methods A total of 113 cirrhotic patients with diuretic intractable (n=45) and recurrent ascites (n=68) with MAP ≤ 82 mmHg were included. Of the 113 patients, 85 patients received midodrine (12.5±2.5 mg thrice daily) and weekly albumin 20-40 g/day to achieve a serum albumin level of 4 g/dL with standard medical therapy (SMT), whereas 28 patients received SMT alone. On follow-up, at three months, we evaluated and compared the control of ascites, urinary sodium, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and renal arterial resistive index (RARI) between arm 1 and arm 2. Results Among 113 patients, mean Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) and Model for End-stage Liver Disease-sodium (MELD-Na) scores were comparable in both arms (CTP 9.52±1.16 and 9±1.18 and MELD 21.33±4.17 and 22.36±4.2 in arm 1 and arm 2, respectively). After three months of therapy in arm 1, a significant increase was seen in urinary sodium excretion (25.99±15.73 and 114.38±71.33 meq/24 hours), MAP (78.91±3.11 and 84.3±3.13 mmHg), SVR (1,059.4±23.09 and 1,178.3±12.39 dynes/s/cm⁵), and decrease in RARI (0.71±0.054 and 0.67±0.039) (p <0.05). The median overall survival and ascites control were better in arm 1 (p <0.001) at the end of follow-up (12 months). Conclusion Response-guided midodrine and weekly albumin therapy, along with SMT, have better overall survival and ascites control.
背景 在内脏和全身血管极度扩张以及平均动脉压(MAP)较低的情况下,动员失代偿期肝硬化患者的腹水面临重大挑战。我们旨在评估口服血管收缩剂和每周白蛋白治疗对肝硬化患者利尿剂难治性和复发性腹水的疗效及生存益处。材料与方法 共纳入113例MAP≤82 mmHg的肝硬化患者,其中利尿剂难治性腹水患者45例,复发性腹水患者68例。在这113例患者中,85例患者接受去氧肾上腺素(12.5±2.5 mg,每日三次)和每周20 - 40 g白蛋白治疗,通过标准药物治疗(SMT)使血清白蛋白水平达到4 g/dL,而28例患者仅接受SMT治疗。随访三个月时,我们评估并比较了两组患者的腹水控制情况、尿钠、全身血管阻力(SVR)和肾动脉阻力指数(RARI)。结果 在113例患者中,两组的平均Child - Turcotte - Pugh(CTP)评分和终末期肝病钠模型(MELD - Na)评分相当(第一组CTP为9.52±1.16,第二组为9±1.18;第一组MELD为21.33±4.17,第二组为22.36±4.2)。第一组治疗三个月后,尿钠排泄量(分别为25.99±15.73和114.38±71.33 meq/24小时)、MAP(分别为78.91±3.11和84.3±3.13 mmHg)、SVR(分别为1,059.4±23.09和1,178.3±12.39 dynes/s/cm⁵)显著增加,RARI降低(分别为0.71±0.054和0.67±0.039)(p<0.05)。随访结束(12个月)时,第一组的中位总生存期和腹水控制情况更好(p<0.001)。结论 以反应为导向的去氧肾上腺素和每周白蛋白治疗联合SMT,具有更好的总生存期和腹水控制效果。