• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于盆腔器官脱垂的创新微创技术:V-Notes侧方悬吊术

Innovative minimally invasive technique for pelvic organ prolapse: V-Notes lateral suspension.

作者信息

Bulutlar Eralp, Uluutku Bulutlar Gizem Berfin, Boz Izceyhan Gizem, Aktaş Özgür, Albayrak Denizli Ayşe Betül, Kiliççi Çetin

机构信息

Zeynep Kamil Women's and Children's Disease Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025 Feb;51(2):e16232. doi: 10.1111/jog.16232.

DOI:10.1111/jog.16232
PMID:39915914
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develop a novel antiprolapse surgical technique utilizing minimally invasive methods with lateral suspension in natural orifice surgeries.

AIMS

The primary objective of this study was to describe a modified V-Notes lateral suspension (VNLS) technique as a viable alternative for antiprolapse surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective clinical trial evaluating a new surgical technique.

METHODS

Patients indicated for lateral suspension underwent the procedure using the V-Notes technique through natural orifices. No additional incisions were made on the anterior abdominal wall, except for the mesh exit points.

RESULTS

Post-operation, the only incisions present were the two lateral mesh outlet incisions on the anterior abdominal wall. Additionally, there was no need for peritonization as the Alexis wound protector/retractor was used extraperitoneally. The outcomes were comparable to those achieved with laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS). The VNLS technique demonstrated favorable results, including shorter hospital stays and improved cosmetic outcomes compared to traditional LLS. This innovative approach has the potential to become the new gold standard in antiprolapse surgery, providing benefits such as minimal invasiveness and enhanced aesthetics.

CONCLUSION

While the optimal treatment for pelvic organ prolapse remains undetermined, natural orifice surgeries like V-Notes offer promising advantages, including reduced invasiveness and superior cosmetic results, suggesting their potential for future standard practice.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发一种新型的抗脱垂手术技术,该技术在自然腔道手术中采用微创方法并进行侧向悬吊。

目的

本研究的主要目的是描述一种改良的V-Notes侧向悬吊(VNLS)技术,作为抗脱垂手术的一种可行替代方法。

研究设计

这是一项评估新手术技术的前瞻性临床试验。

方法

适合进行侧向悬吊的患者通过自然腔道采用V-Notes技术进行手术。除了网片出口点外,前腹壁未做额外切口。

结果

术后,仅在前腹壁留下两个侧向网片出口切口。此外,由于使用Alexis伤口保护器/牵开器在腹膜外操作,无需进行腹膜化。结果与腹腔镜侧向悬吊(LLS)相当。VNLS技术显示出良好的效果,与传统LLS相比,住院时间更短,美容效果更佳。这种创新方法有可能成为抗脱垂手术的新金标准,具有微创和美观增强等优点。

结论

虽然盆腔器官脱垂的最佳治疗方法尚未确定,但像V-Notes这样的自然腔道手术具有显著优势,包括侵袭性降低和美容效果更佳,表明它们有潜力成为未来的标准术式。

相似文献

1
Innovative minimally invasive technique for pelvic organ prolapse: V-Notes lateral suspension.用于盆腔器官脱垂的创新微创技术:V-Notes侧方悬吊术
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025 Feb;51(2):e16232. doi: 10.1111/jog.16232.
2
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术的围手术期干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013105.
3
Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.针对患有或未患有压力性尿失禁的盆腔器官脱垂女性的手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013108.
4
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.女性盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub3.
5
Laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic literature review.腹腔镜下侧方悬吊带术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:系统文献回顾。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.044. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
6
Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.腹腔镜与经腹骶骨阴道固定术治疗多部位盆腔器官脱垂的系统评价
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Feb;11(1):15-22. doi: 10.1111/ases.12478.
7
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
8
Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹及经阴道联合子宫切除术治疗女性生殖道盆腔脏器脱垂的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2021-2031. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04861-4. Epub 2021 May 29.
9
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
10
Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse.针对后盆腔脏器脱垂女性的手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 5;3(3):CD012975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012975.

引用本文的文献

1
Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.70岁以上患者因肿瘤和非肿瘤原因进行子宫切除术——机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放手术方式的比较
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 19;19(1):497. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02676-9.
2
Global, regional, and national prevalence and trends of gynecological diseases among women of childbearing age from 1990 to 2021: An analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021.1990年至2021年全球育龄妇女妇科疾病的全球、区域和国家患病率及趋势:全球疾病负担研究2021分析
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0329336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329336. eCollection 2025.
3
Retrospective comparative study on efficacy and safety of different surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.
盆腔器官脱垂不同手术方法疗效与安全性的回顾性对比研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07878-7.