Özer Hazal, Abaklı İnci Merve, Açar Tuzluca Sevcihan
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Front Dent Med. 2023 Mar 24;4:1140794. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2023.1140794. eCollection 2023.
The study aims to compare the bond strength of three primary tooth root canal filling materials to the root canal wall with a push-out test (Calplus, DiaPaste, BIOfactor MTA). First, 30 primary central teeth were cut transversely using a water-cooled low-speed diamond saw vertical to the long axis to obtain 2 mm thick discs from the middle third of the roots. Next the materials used were placed on dentin discs and kept in an incubator for 1 week at 37°C and 100% humidity until the hardening mechanism of the root-canal sealer was completed. Finally, a vertical force was placed on each material from apical to coronal with a 0.75 mm diameter stainless steel cylindrical piston without contacting the root canal dentin. The data were analyzed using the SPSS 22.0 program and the Mann-Whitney U test was used as a test. There was a statistically significant difference between the bonding values of different primary tooth root canal sealers to root canal dentin ( < 0.05). Among the maximum binding values, the lowest measurement was in Calplus (0.43 ± 0.28 MPa), and the highest measurement was in BIOfactor MTA (24.24 ± 17.78 MPa) ( < 0.05). BIOfactor MTA has a higher bonding value to root canal dentin than calcium hydroxide-based primary tooth canal sealers.
本研究旨在通过推出试验比较三种乳牙根管充填材料(Calplus、DiaPaste、BIOfactor MTA)与根管壁之间的粘结强度。首先,使用水冷低速金刚石锯垂直于30颗乳前牙的长轴横向切割,从牙根中部三分之一处获得2毫米厚的牙片。接下来,将所用材料置于牙本质片上,并在37°C、湿度100%的培养箱中放置1周,直至根管封闭剂的硬化机制完成。最后,用直径0.75毫米的不锈钢圆柱形活塞从根尖向冠方对每种材料施加垂直力,且不接触根管牙本质。使用SPSS 22.0程序对数据进行分析,并采用曼-惠特尼U检验作为检验方法。不同乳牙根管封闭剂与根管牙本质的粘结值之间存在统计学显著差异(P<0.05)。在最大粘结值中,Calplus的测量值最低(0.43±0.28兆帕),BIOfactor MTA的测量值最高(24.24±17.78兆帕)(P<0.05)。与氢氧化钙基乳牙根管封闭剂相比,BIOfactor MTA与根管牙本质的粘结值更高。