Yin Zhe, Zhang Xiu-Hang, He Yi-Yi, Cai Duo, Zhou Xin, Li Yu-Tang, Yu Qing-Hua, Yu Jia-Ao, Chen Xin-Xin
The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 7;40(1):77. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04333-x.
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of combining pulsed dye laser (PDL) and ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser (AFCL) in the treatment of scars in pediatric patients, as well as to identify appropriate treatment parameters, initial treatment timing, and treatment intervals through a systematic literature review. A literature search was conducted between April 6, 2014 and April 6, 2024 in four databases to select studies on the effects of the combination of carbon dioxide fractional laser and pulsed dye laser therapy in children hypertrophic burn scars. This systematic literature review included 497 participants across 8 studies, with individual study sample sizes ranging from 17 to 125 participants. 7 studies reported the gender distribution of participants, with a higher proportion of males (60%, n = 264) than females (40%, n = 170). The average age of the patients was 7.18 years, and scald (62%, n = 235) were identified as the primary cause of scar. The combination therapy of 595 nm PDL and 10,600 nm AFCL significantly improved Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) / Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score. Study treatment intervals were approximately 1-2 months for simultaneous treatment and 1 month for PDL and 3 months for AFCL for sequential treatment. Two studies investigated the efficacy of early laser therapy (< 3 months), the AFCL laser energy parameters ranged from 30 mJ-50 mJ, significantly lower than the rest of the studies of laser energy parameters, which ranged from 50 mJ-120 mJ. The PDL energy density parameters showed little difference from study to study and were in the range of 5-12 J/cm. Complications after treatment (4%, n = 22), with rash being the most common (50%, n = 11). Rational use of PDL combined with AFCL (lower laser energy, increase density parameters, shorten treatment intervals (< 1 month)) can safely and effectively treat hypertrophic scars in pediatric burn patients and is superior to single-type laser therapy in efficacy. Significant disorganization was observed among studies suggesting the need to explore high-level evidence-based clinical research that may improve treatment outcomes.
本研究旨在通过系统的文献综述,确定脉冲染料激光(PDL)与剥脱性分数二氧化碳激光(AFCL)联合治疗小儿患者瘢痕的有效性,并确定合适的治疗参数、初始治疗时机和治疗间隔。于2014年4月6日至2024年4月6日在四个数据库中进行文献检索,以选择关于二氧化碳分数激光与脉冲染料激光联合治疗儿童增生性烧伤瘢痕效果的研究。该系统文献综述纳入了8项研究中的497名参与者,各研究的样本量从17名至125名参与者不等。7项研究报告了参与者的性别分布,男性比例(60%,n = 264)高于女性(40%,n = 170)。患者的平均年龄为7.18岁,烫伤(62%,n = 235)被确定为瘢痕的主要成因。595nm PDL与10600nm AFCL联合治疗显著改善了温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)/患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)评分。研究的治疗间隔对于同时治疗约为1 - 2个月,对于序贯治疗,PDL为1个月,AFCL为3个月。两项研究调查了早期激光治疗(<3个月)的疗效,AFCL激光能量参数范围为30mJ - 50mJ,显著低于其余研究的激光能量参数范围,后者为50mJ - 120mJ。PDL能量密度参数在各研究之间差异不大,范围为5 - 12J/cm²。治疗后并发症发生率为4%(n = 22),皮疹最为常见(50%,n = 11)。合理使用PDL联合AFCL(降低激光能量、增加密度参数、缩短治疗间隔(<1个月))可安全有效地治疗小儿烧伤患者的增生性瘢痕,且疗效优于单一类型激光治疗。研究之间存在显著的异质性,提示需要探索可能改善治疗效果的高级别循证临床研究。